At least she was a good mum and raised some well balanced, likeable children.

Oh, hang on.......

On 6 Jan 2012, at 10:16, dave miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Mark
> 
> I get worried by this reworking of history - someone recently remarked
> to me that Thatcher wasn't all bad - that she did good stuff as well
> as bad, and I let it pass. But then later I was thinking about it, and
> I can't think of a single good thing she did. I suppose she must have
> done something good in her life, if only by mistake?
> 
> dave
> 
> 
> 
> On 6 January 2012 10:02, Mark Hancock <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Dave, a timely reminder ( not that those of us old enough in the UK need 
>> it!) of this vile woman and her time in office. It truly worries me that 
>> there has been this revisionist reworking of the Thatcher era. Is she being 
>> held up as a strong feminist hero by people who forget what she was like? 
>> Hopefully not! I do wonder if she's part of a nostalgia for 80s culture 
>> generally and that some people are thinking that it was a prosperous, joyful 
>> era, with great fashions etc? As long as people remember that the New 
>> Romantics were a 'last days of Pompeii' response to the era!
>> 
>> As an antidote to this film, let's all watch the Boys From The Blackstuff!
>> 
>> Never forget
>> 
>> M
>> 
>> On 6 Jan 2012, at 09:47, dave miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> http://www.thenation.com/blog/165450/iron-lady-margaret-thatcher-movie-we-dont-need
>>> 
>>> The Iron Lady just opened in London where, let's hope, it
>>> generates some serious critique. The critical silence in the
>>> US has been astounding only made worse by the praise, not
>>> just for the film but for its subject, former British Prime
>>> Minister Margaret Thatcher, played in the movie by Meryl
>>> Streep.
>>> 
>>> Newsweek's holiday double issue slapped Streep as Thatcher
>>> on its cover, hailing "The New Thatcher Era." The feature
>>> story in summary reads: "Margaret Thatcher was the infamous
>>> Iron Lady the Brits love to hate. This month's bio starring
>>> Meryl Streep proves she was right all along."
>>> 
>>> Streep's already winning awards and accolades and Oscars are
>>> probably on the way. People are saying the film's no
>>> whitewash because it shows the former Prime Minister in her
>>> dotage, fighting dementia - three decades after she came to
>>> power. Director Phyllida Lloyd has described the treatment
>>> as operatic. Streep's called it revealing. The two
>>> collaborated before on the musical Mamma Mia!    The truth
>>> is, in Lloyd's hands Thatcher's iron isn't just rusty, it's
>>> melted down and depoliticized, made feminist enough to root
>>> for and ultimately sad enough for some to sniffle at. The
>>> Iron Lady is Thatcher -- The ABBA Version. It's the last
>>> thing we need, ever, and especially at this point.
>>> 
>>> Think of Thatcher and I think of hungry people. Irish hunger
>>> strikers, first of all, ten of whom starved to death for
>>> status as political prisoners on her watch. Thatcher
>>> insisted anti-government rebels in Afghanistan were
>>> "resistance fighters," not terrorists, but it was a
>>> different story for the Irish. Indeed, in Thatcher's time,
>>> there was to be no story, no effort to understand the
>>> reasons for the conflict in Northern Ireland; certainly
>>> there was to be no discussion or consideration in public of
>>> why anyone might pick up a gun, or place a bomb, or starve
>>> themselves to death.
>>> 
>>> Long before the USA PATRIOT Act and the 9-11 demonization of
>>> asking "why," Britons were starved of information about the
>>> so-called "troubles." Under an ever-expanding Prevention of
>>> Terrorism Act, British journalists were forced to report to
>>> police any contact with any "known or suspected terrorist."
>>> Irish parties to the conflict were banned from speaking on
>>> radio and TV yet Thatcher's government could tell the public
>>> any lie it liked. When British secret service snipers shot
>>> and killed three unarmed IRA members (two men and a woman,
>>> Mairead Farrell,) on the island of Gibraltar in 1988,
>>> Thatcher's government released an official story about
>>> crossfire and a gun fight, and a bomb planted near an old
>>> people's home. Video footage of an impressive little
>>> military robot supposedly defusing an incendiary device
>>> played on the evening news. It wasn't true. Lloyd's film
>>> shows the IRA's bombings and bloodshed but not the denial
>>> and the deadly government tactics which likely delayed peace
>>> talks for a decade.
>>> 
>>> Think of Thatcher and I think of the hungry people who
>>> started showing up in villages in Yorkshire and Scotland and
>>> Wales where work was scarce because Thatcher's experts
>>> decided nuclear power was a better energy source than
>>> unionized coalfields. Miners went on strike - for a year.
>>> Their wives and children collected soup-kitchen money from
>>> their churches and their neighbors and when they ran out,
>>> they went down to London where they tried to tell their
>>> story of helmeted horsemen charging the ranks of union
>>> strikers and police bashing men's heads in. But Londoners
>>> didn't believe them. They'd heard the miners were greedy and
>>> dangerous and a threat to their jobs. After all, "trade
>>> union power is the true cause of unemployment," said
>>> Thatcher. The 1984 strike by the National Union of
>>> Mineworkers (NUM) gets a couple of seconds on screen in
>>> Lloyd's film, but there's no explanation, no follow-up and
>>> no consideration: does anyone wish now that they'd listened
>>> to the miners then?
>>> 
>>> "There is no such thing as society. Only individuals."
>>> Thatcher also said. With more spending by successive
>>> Thatcher governments on police (so-called "law and order")
>>> and less on just about everything else, "no society" became
>>> true soon enough. The Iron Lady shows Prime Minister
>>> Thatcher over-ruling her "wet" male colleagues over waging
>>> war with Argentina. A few hundred far-off Falkland Islanders
>>> were worth fighting for, she famously decided. A take-
>>> control feminist? The film ignores the families in Toxteth
>>> (inner city Liverpool) and Brixton (a largely black
>>> neighborhood in London) whom Thatcher found it quite
>>> acceptable to sacrifice. Cabinet papers released by the
>>> National Archives just now under a 30-year rule reveal
>>> Thatcher's closest advisers told her that the "concentration
>>> of hopelessness" on Merseyside was "very largely self-
>>> inflicted" and not worth government repair.
>>> 
>>> Thatcher didn't - actually - evacuate Liverpool in the
>>> aftermath of the 1981 inner-city riots. She led something
>>> more insidious. With her professionally crafted "grocer's
>>> daughter" image, Thatcher gave class-conscious Britons
>>> permission to dismiss real human difficulties with a blow-
>>> dried bourgeois smirk: Unemployed? Get on yer bike! Said her
>>> administration. Got a problem? You're the problem! In
>>> Maggie's world, deprivation is your own damn fault.
>>> 
>>> Nor did Thatcher give people permission only to look away.
>>> Under Thatcher and egged-on by her, those who could leave
>>> troubled towns and troubled people did, and so did
>>> government.  We'd "mind the gap" (between the train and the
>>> platform) on the London Underground, but we came not to mind
>>> the gap between the rich and the rest, the north and the
>>> south; the possibilities people had if they needed things to
>>> be public and the possibilities they had if they could pay
>>> for the private stuff - the private health care, the private
>>> school, the private house. Today, in a new time of budget
>>> wars, The Iron Lady's depiction of draconian cuts as
>>> feminist guts is chilling.  What Thatcher called "harsh
>>> medicine" meant one thing for the poor and another for the
>>> very powerful then, and it still does. In both instances,
>>> there is hell to pay in social fabric.
>>> 
>>> I don't remember if Lloyd's Lady quotes the real lady's most
>>> famous phrase: "There is No Alternative."  Certainly TINA
>>> deserves star billing. Thatcher's quip about globalized
>>> capitalism has defined our epoch. People can debate the
>>> successes and failures of "the Thatcher era" all they like.
>>> One thing's for certain, we don't need a new one because the
>>> old one's still here. The consequences of the politicies
>>> Thatcher pioneered and made respectable - deregulation,
>>> privatization and globalization - can be measured in public
>>> costs and private profits on both sides of the Atlantic.
>>> More damning, even, is the enduring cultural habit of denial
>>> (looking away;) and the political practice of silence;
>>> shutting the problem people up.
>>> 
>>> Grow the gap between government and the governed and you get
>>> what we have: a burnt-out world driven by the super-super-
>>> rich where some are stealing others blind and billions are
>>> alienated or angry, sure that government has nothing to
>>> offer but a bash on the head.
>>> 
>>> Lloyd's soft-pop version deals with none of this.
>>> Ironically, the "deeds matter" Thatcher herself would
>>> probably be the first to dislike this shrunken, personal-
>>> over-political fantasy of her inner life. Lucky for us, we
>>> don't need to worry about her. We need to worry about us. We
>>> are not demented. There are alternatives. There always have
>>> been. What we need (among other things) are more movies
>>> about the women - and maybe a few of the men -- bringing
>>> those to life.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to