well there has been networked video performance since at least the mid-90s on the internet (e.g. parkbench) & using satellite in the 1970s (rabinowitz & galloway); also there was quite a lot around the end of the 90s/early 2000s e.g. steve dixon's chameleons, igor stromajer, & groups like corpus informaticus, DOGONEfff, etc. since 2007 there is aether9, since 2008 minipimer.tv - & many others that are experimenting in networked video ...
h : ) On 14/03/12 12:25 AM, Antonio Roberts wrote: >> what you have described is true of networked performance in general, not >> just networked video performance (except perhaps the last point - do you >> mean that the output also includes input from audience? which is the >> case in some but not all networked performance). are you only concerned >> with video? > With this I mean each player in the performance. So, if the composer > of the piece has decided that they want the audience to be involved > then they will have a say in the final output. > > I'm primarily concern with video as I feel not much research has gone > into this area. I don't know everything, but so so my experience has > showed me that most networked performance revolves around audio, not > video. > > Antonio -- ____________________________________________________________ helen varley jamieson: creative catalyst [email protected] http://www.creative-catalyst.com http://www.make-shift.net http://www.upstage.org.nz ____________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
