Thanks for the explanation! Here's me realizing how stupid I really am! "Do we fuck" being a (fairly?) working class expression for "not at all", meaning no the working class don't love neoplasticism and as a reaction to my initial interpretation that the drawings are mocking the working class for being complacent about the ruling classes fucking them (the sickel & hammer worker I took as representing the ruling class ruler of some sort - yes yes I know...).
Showing how distanced I've become to art now, I didn't know what neoplasticism is until I looked it up. Had took it to mean some sort of political ideology by the ruling class requiring the working class to be more dynamic and flexible in their approach to work! dynamic: plastic can be moulded to any shape etc flexible: bend over backwards for... In Britain it's not uncommon to hear low-wage workers joke about putting a broom up their asses so they can sweep the floor at the same time as their main job - ie usually stood up operating some sort of machinery etc. I'm the type of bloke who doesn't really enjoy looking at representations of sodomy for too long. James. On 16/08/12 "manik" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi James, >There's double negative particle(gram.) in Serbian language/for >example;it's usual to say,on Serbian-"I don't have nothing.''/that >mean,considered English,that I/or somebody/don't have nothing-he have >something(but it's clear,for ones who talk Serbian that Subject who >speak really have nothing). So,when you say ;"I have nothing..."it's >clear that you possess 'nothing'. So,when MANIK put workers in sexual >relationship in front of some picture who refer on >neoplasticism,he/MANIK/act according rule in his/Serbian/grammar.In >that logic neither workers fuck each other,neither they love >neoplasticism,but in some different grammar/theory/it's possible to do >that/both/. That's how MANIK put things together/sometimes/. Later on >we shall manipulate with complete different logic,grammar or >philosophical contents to show plural of /workers and wider/ >issue...There's one goal behind that action:MANIK wish to examine >using different methods possibility to act efficiency using jagged >and rich possibility of art/techne/. ...MANIK...AUGUST...2012... ----- >Original Message ----- From: "James Morris" <[email protected]> >To: <[email protected]> >Cc: "manik" <[email protected]> >Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 1:55 PM >Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] THE WORKING CLASS LOVE NEOPLASTICISM 1 > > >> On 16/08/12 "manik" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>...THE WORKING CLASS LOVE NEOPLASTICISM...MANIK...AUGUST...2012... >> >> do we fuck. >> > -- http://jwm-art.net/ image/audio/text/code/ _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
