I like that as a Zerography!
Le 28/02/13 16:32, Alan Sondheim a écrit :
>
> writing degree zero / drawing blanks
>
> digestion and lying {0} {0}, rhetoric pure one-on -one
> denotation, "_absolute {0},_ then, would be a discourse reduced
> to its _essence_ if the "there you are" functions as _practical
> {0}_ for group reaching _{0},_ an entropic balance with surround
> envirment. science is not domain humanities - nor even
> scientists. but there were _absolute signifier_ certainly
> implies approach possible enunciation that extended metaphors
> may also are way through processes, returning _process future of
> cosmos writing/inscribing horizon particles, decathection {0}?
> equations converge veer; should one infinite returns
> writing/culture {0}. suppose it dead, echo toggled off. there's
> this it. do check out. was digital {0,1} constitutes spectrum
> {0}; 1 below, then 0.0 monica avatars, {avatars backed,
> telegraphy: cohering obdurate/analogic real. cyberspace, we're
> anorectic destined towards death, already duet tends {0}: zero,_
> parle, process is: zero; 0" every original deformation in
> already: writing/ inscribing subject who remain impervious,
> phenomenology. infinite. what _not_ literature echo's
>
> writing degree zero / drawing blanks
>
> digestion and lying {0} writing {0}, rhetoric {0}, pure one-on
> -one denotation, "_absolute {0},_ then, would be a discourse
> reduced to its _essence_ if the "there you are" functions as a
> _practical {0}_ for group pure reaching _{0},_ an entropic
> balance with the surround envirment. science is writing {0}, not
> a domain for the humanities - nor even for scientists. but {0},
> as if there were an _absolute signifier_ and certainly {0}
> implies an approach and even possible enunciation that extended
> metaphors may also surround {0}, metaphors that are way through
> processes, returning to the _process {0},_ that is the future of
> the cosmos - writing/inscribing {0} - the horizon of particles,
> decathection {0}? the equations converge and veer; the writing
> should be {0} and degree one and degree infinite returns
> writing/culture {0}. suppose it dead, you dead, writing {0},
> and echo is toggled off. if there's a writing {0}, this is it.
> do check it out. it was digital {0,1} constitutes a spectrum
> {0}; if 1 is below, then 0.0 digestion and lying {0}, monica
> avatars, {avatars backed, {0,1} constitutes spectrum {0}; a {0}
> to telegraphy: cohering with the obdurate/analogic real. to
> cyberspace, we're anorectic {0}, destined towards death, already
> the duet tends towards {0}: writing {0}, and echo is toggled
> off. _absolute degree zero,_ then, would be a discourse reduced
> to parle, and certainly {0} to the process {0}, that is: the
> future of the cosmos - writing/inscribing {0} - the horizon of
> particles, decathection {0}? the equations converge and veer;
> the writing should be {0} and degree one and degree infinite
> {0,1} constitutes a spectrum degree zero; if one is below, 0"
> every original is a deformation degree zero in cyberspace, we're
> anorectic {0}, destined towards death, already: the future of
> the cosmos - writing/ inscribing {0} - the horizon every
> original is a deformation {0}. subject who may remain
> impervious, the {0} of phenomenology. {0}, but degree infinite.
> what is _not_ literature is already the future of the cosmos -
> writing/inscribing {0} - the horizon of returns writing/culture
> {0}. suppose it dead, you dead, echo's off.
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
