On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 00:17:00 +0000, Eduardo Valle wrote: > But the software to run needs a microprocessor
There are technological: http://opencores.org and social answers to this: http://www.furtherfield.org/zerodollarlaptop/ as I have already mentioned. > thats why advocates > for free like others enterprises is the same shit strategy ... Free Software ensures that you are as free to use the software in itself as is possible. Open Source ensures that free enterprise can lock you out of microprocessors that you own. > Google also says that Internet is free... They support its freedom where it supports them: https://www.google.com/takeaction/ > ICANN Dictatorship also says Internet is free ... The Internet both is and is not free. What is certain is that what freedom there is is under threat. In the face of this we should not cede the concept of freedom to organisations that misrepresent it, and certainly not in favour of their own marketing speak. Innovating Open Source solutions to realtime marketization is not a clearer objective than protecting the freedom of individuals to use software. For those of you on the list who have read this far, here's a song - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qb_Uu0eTNWk - Rob. _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
