Hi Michael,
Your picture actualize ethic problem considered role of creative people in 
global social environment. After your explanation I can see better what was 
your intention / things are more complicated than it look on first sight /. 
Subversive acting trough art is on edge; sometimes it's more than subversion 
and became part of transcend, aesthetic, mental world of art. Often we are 
carefulness and under all kind of stress, and we forgot that  'moral right'  
which artist have as creative man/woman  / to disturb and attack our habits 
trough art /  is more important than our comfortable position of spectator.
BTW. picture is painted very good:)
Best 
MANIK  
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Michael Szpakowski 
  To: manik ; NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity 
  Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 10:34 AM
  Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Fw: there are facts in philosophy


  Hi Manik
  I would have thought you both might have appreciated the impetus behind a BIG 
STATEMENT IN CAPITAL LETTERS ( in fact it was only when I read your reply that 
I realised that a big subconscious influence on the piece was..... M***K)

  You're absolutely right to observe the amount of effort that went into it - 
it is a painting in addition to whatever else it is.

  For the record I *do* think the status of Heidegger, as a huge influence on 
both artistic and philosophical discourse, remains an important and deeply 
problematic one.

  From "everybody knows" it can be a short distance to "everybody forgets".

  I don't think its anything to do with "forgiveness". The question of whether 
I ( or any one else for that matter) "forgive" Heidegger is neither here not 
there.

  Lastly, I absolutely agree that Nazi ideology remains a terrible threat - 
there was a feature on Golden Dawn, the Greek Nazi outfit, on channel 4 news 
the other night in which one of their MPs openly talked, laughing, of taking 
the gold teeth out of the mouths of immigrants and making soap and lampshades 
of their skin.

  your friend ( I hope)
  michael










------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: manik <[email protected]>
  To: netbehaviour <[email protected]> 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2013 11:36 PM
  Subject: [NetBehaviour] Fw: there are facts in philosophy



  ...We couldn't understand why we have in front of our eyes so hard labor to 
describe Heidegger nazi background  (source Wikipedia, thanks Annie! ). We 
don't  know educated man who haven't heard for that fact about his life and 
work. Is this  the fact who help us to think that history exist in shape we / 
but who are 'we'; one who are closse to power (?), or 'we' who fight agains 
nazi 60 years ago?/.We always get answer in  key of politics coretnes and 
closse eyes toward actual happening in EU? 
  How came Bill Clinton have only part of one sentence considered his role in 
NATO war against Serbia 1999 / Main Subject - USA was lider, of course / in 
which  is just kind of observer.That's happened in same Wikipedia who describe 
Heidegger as 'fellow traveler' considered his role in nazi party ? How came 
Hana Arent forgiwe Heidegger but 'we' can't  forgive him? What's the reason 
'we' re-actualise Hedegger's nazi membership? Is that cover of sad truth that 
nazism IS winer( after 60 years - yes! ) but it's wining ideology in West 
civisation /Bulgaria,Poland,Romania send huge number of workers in Germany and 
that's why they survive in EU /.That's only one examply in number of similar 
significant sign who give us correct diagram of  intercorses in EU. We know who 
is boss!
   Is there any goal /except conquare Rusia / they, nazi, didn't reach?  German 
is leading nation in Europe and their word is decisive for every question in 
economy in EU, and more .... 
  So, Hedegger left us his philosophy and his politics wrong judgement, but 
nazi as active and liding ideology is live, rich and well ... MANIK ... MARCH 
... 2013 ...

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Annie Abrahams 
  To: Michael Szpakowski 
  Cc: netbehaviour 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 6:03 PM
  Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] there are facts in philosophy


  Often I prefer paintings to words, not this time.


  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidegger_and_Nazism 

  The relationship between the German philosopher Martin Heidegger and Nazism 
is a controversial subject.
  Heidegger joined the Nazi Party (NSDAP) on May 1, 1933, ten days after being 
elected Rector of the University of Freiburg. A year later, in April 1934, he 
resigned the Rectorship and stopped taking part in Nazi Party meetings, but 
remained a member of the Party until its dismantling at the end of World War 
II. Heidegger had held high hopes of reforming the university system with the 
help of Nazism as a Conservative Revolution, but, by the end of the War, had 
become expendable and was even prevented from teaching. The denazification 
hearings immediately after World War II led to Heidegger's dismissal from 
Freiburg, banning him from teaching; after several years of investigation, the 
French military finally classified Heidegger in 1949 as a Mitläufer or Nazi 
follower (Mitläufer : person who gives into peer pressure without participation 
nor resistance nor inner conviction, unlike a fellow traveler, literally 
"with-runner" similar to "lemming-like"). The teaching ban was lifted in 1951 
and he was granted emeritus status in 1953, but he was never allowed to resume 
his philosophy chair. His involvement with Nazism and the relation between his 
philosophy and National Socialism are still highly controversial, especially 
because he never apologized nor expressed regret,[1] except privately when he 
called his rectorship and the related political engagement "the greatest 
stupidity of his life" (die größte Dummheit seines Lebens).[2]
  http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidegger_et_le_nazisme



  On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Michael Szpakowski <[email protected]> wrote:



    http://www.flickr.com/photos/szpako/8534703986/in/photostream




    cheers


    michael



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  _______________________________________________
  NetBehaviour mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

  _______________________________________________
  NetBehaviour mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to