Arse Elektronika 2013 / Call for Submissions

ID/ENTITY

monochrom's festival on sex and tech and id/entities.
October 3-6, 2013 in San Francisco.

Call for talks, performances, workshops, games, machines.
Deadline for submissions: July 15, 2013

----------------

Sex, technology, identity... big-ass sweeping themes for Arse 
Elektronika 2013.

Identity, but also identification. Technologies for the exploration of 
identities. Technologies for the articulation and performance of 
identities. Technologies for the enforcement of hegemonic identities. 
Technologies for the verification of identities. For example: What about 
the vast fencing-off of the old wild internet; the #nym-wars and the 
push for "real names"?

We typically assume there is 'something' that takes and/or performs an 
identity. What is this entity? Are awareness and consciousness strictly 
limited to and made sense of in human experience alone? How is identity 
understood and made sense of in terms of artificial intelligence? What 
might transhuman, android, or cyborg identities consist of? What does 
sexual desire mean to a dolphin?

We have technology-based identities. If we are to agree that agency is a 
key factor in identity AND position technology as extension/manipulation 
of agency, then is technology an identity in and of itself?

The Bay Area, famous as a place to "find yourself," also hosts vast 
projects to organize and catalog the world's identities, whether they 
want that or not. So, how does the Californian Ideology drive identity 
politics and techno-sexuality?

Will apps like Bang With Friends and gadgets like Google Glass provide 
us with the ultimate gonzo pornoverse? And why are services like 
LinkedIn explicitly banning escorts from using the site to get clients?

What have been the social ramifications of Web 2.0, ten years on? By 
what means have queer users of dating sites and social networks reframed 
or otherwise hacked the systems surrounding them? What is the design 
history of the drop-down gender menu- and its alternatives? How did 
Facebook's inclusion of "in an open relationship" as a standard option 
for one's relationship status affect youth mores? What has been the 
effect of location-based hookup apps on the architecture of cruising? 
What are the economics of niche dating sites, and how are they policed? 
What are the ethical obligations surrounding the ability to 
algorithmically identify those who are in the closet?

What technologies could ensure more flexible, fluid identities? What 
would TSA protocols look like if they were designed from a queer 
perspective? What does counter-surveillant fashion look like? How might 
we ensure the right not to be found? (Should we?) Are there technologies 
for anonymity that do not also afford stalking and harassment? Are there 
technologies for transparency that do not also afford stalking and 
harassment?

If an identity requires recognition (either by the self or through the 
Other), then is it ever possible to be "truly" or "identifiably" queer? 
Is 'queer identity' an oxymoron?

Former Tory chairman Lord Tebbit warns that legalizing gay marriage in 
the UK "opens up the possibility of a lesbian queen giving birth to a 
future monarch by artificial insemination." Interesting times for sex 
tech? Indeed!

What about a historic dimension? What were techno-sexual systems of 
identity like in the past? What were the technologies of masked rituals? 
What technologies drove the invention of privacy? How did the adoption 
of fingerprinting change the regulation of prostitution in the early 
20th century? Besides hanky-flagging, what techniques/technologies were 
used to signal 'deviant' interests? How was handwriting judged in the 
evaluation of potential lovers? What is the techno-social history of the 
"secret admirer?"

How will technological progress change the way we see ourselves? What 
are we without our iPhone and our beloved designer vibrator? Is the 
Marxian commodity fetish actually entering the sphere of (what a 
wordplay!) customization fetishism?

If orgasm patterns are unique and impossible to duplicate, could one's 
sexual response be the ultimate biometric identifier? So, how worried 
should we be about the spectre of sphincter-printing?

What about Big Data in a sexual context? Does size matter?

What about a decent ontological debate with your buttplug's AI?

Well... dear entities out there, with your proud Egos, Super-Egos and 
Hyper-Egos! Never forget that there is an Id lurking round the corner! 
The real Voight-Kampff test is not minding that it hurts!

----------------

Please submit through our form: http://bit.ly/18eOWEP
Deadline for submissions: July, 15 2013

For questions, please email: office AT monochrom.at

----------------

http://www.monochrom.at/arse-elektronika

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to