On 14 July 2013 19:14, alias noemata <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:14 PM, James Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > > or sum > > ====== > > > > | + > > ----- > > > > > > 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 == 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 > > > > == awesome > > 2^4-1 = 15 ? > i think it's just because of the number of disjuncts > for five you can for instance have > 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 == 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 > > if you want to equal 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5, i don't know what you have to say > maybe something in the irrational category: > first there's a person (1), he has to choose between two doors and enter > one (2) > after that, he's supposed to choose between one and a half door and > enter 'one' of them (3) > then, he's supposed to not choose but just go through one (4) > finally, there's an extra door around somewhere, let's see if he can > choose it (5) > but maybe it doesn't matter if or what he chooses. > > 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 19 == 0 + 0 + 1 + 4 + 8 + 19 > > > > 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 != 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 > > > > == not awesome > > > > > > not or sum > > ========== > > > > ! | + > > ----- > > > > !(1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5) == !(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5) > > > > == not not awesome > > > > !!(1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5) == !!(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5) > > > > == awesome! > > ?? > is it that if something is not not a cat then it doesn't mean it's a cat? > i don't think it has to be a cat, no, it only says it's not not a cat. > you can add how many nots you want, it won't return to be a cat. > ,imho > those times are over > > well, a well is not a cat, but not cat is not a well. oh well. we'll tell when a well is a cat. we'll tell well, what a cat is not, and not cat is not a cat knot. not twelve thousand three hundred and forty five is zero. not zero is one. so you're quite right, tying a cat in knots annihilates it. a cat in this sense is like a piece of paper, you can't knot it as many times as you like just like you can't fold a piece of paper as many times as you like (or vice-versa). a pigeon or fox or badger run over by a car may be less resistant to folding than a living cat. a big cat may be formidable. a sick cat is not well and not a well and unwell. 6 = 1 + 2 + 3.
> not not something is the same as not not something else, > they're the same in the sense of undefined maybe? > it's like the exclamation marks are in the wrong end!! > > maybe it's a programming practice. > logical or is like + at least > and logical and is like * (multiplication) > the simplicity always astonished me > how can or be an addition? > true if a or b, means truth is a + b > sure > true if a and b, means truth is a * b > both of them have to, > if a is false then a * b is false > > can you have - and / in this, a - b, a / b? > if truth is a - b, then it means that a is true and b is false? > if truth is a / b, then [some boolean algebra] > i think that explains a lot > though not the law of thought as such maybe... > that's another matter, no one knows exactly what > it would be great (i guess) if we were all related > below the quantum soup but who knows, > maybe it's a nightmare, or a dream state > but maybe we don't want to dream forever > to wake up to programmatic logic again > and the breads which are done in six minutes. > > half-asleep > > > > -- > > http://jwm-art.net/ > > image/audio/text/code/ > > _______________________________________________ > > NetBehaviour mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
