I would agree with Rob that it is an improvement on the original *after the fact*. But I wouldn't call it a "great" improvement. I don't think that seeing it out of the context of your statement would invoke the original. Sorry, just being honest.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:22 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > ? > > Il 18/12/13 01.19, Rob Myers ha scritto: > > On 17/12/13 01:23 PM, Michael Szpakowski wrote: > >> > >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/szpako/11384244484/ > > > > A great improvement on the original. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > NetBehaviour mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > -- ***************************** Pall Thayer artist http://pallthayer.dyndns.org *****************************
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
