tldr; imagine paratrooping mimes descending.

As a Programmer and as an Artist, I can tell you that I frequently write Code 
as Literature, with the express intent of having it read rather than executed. 
At first it came from what they called "airplane code." Before airplanes were 
connected to the internet, especially during the era of "enterprise computing" 
no code could be run on an airplane because the compiler was online, on vpn 
even. Yet programmers with good intuition and experience could still write, 
even during an 8-hour flight - all sans compiler. Airplane Code was not poetry; 
it was not meant to be read, but when the programmer's prediction of the 
compiler's reaction became unclear, programmers resorted to psuedo-code buried 
in comments, for their eyes only but none-the-less written in a hybrid language 
of intention and execution - a combination of what they wanted and what they 
thought could work. And then the programmers starting showing these 
psudeo-codes to each other.

Then there comes Programming Education, where code tutorials are designed to be 
read by students, and the Open Source Community's tradition of having 
"well-commented source." Both with brilliant asides/insertions like "insert 
calculus here." These practices formed a toolkit for writing code as 
literature. GIST was designed for just this purpose. GIST uses the same 
principals (*sic*) as GIT, but is designed to be code that is read, rather than 
compiled.

I was surprised it did not come up in the initial discussion, and wanted to 
mention it here. 

A step from GIST to Literature is not hard to see,  especially among dilettante 
and savant programmers, passing messages/documents around, working without 
warrant or language, double especially for the ones called "artists". The realz 
question is why these coppers be bangin' on our Lit yo. Its gots to be about 
power 'cause if iran-contra was theater, then wtf. its Eitha' 'bout weapons or 
influence dog && my moneyz on influence.

In appreciation,
bishopZ
US

Ps, for the heads in the house, we seem to be a far cry from william james 
here; any help on bringing us back, eh?
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to