don't bother with the holarch, it's just another holarch
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Alan Sondheim <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > What is > > > The holarch's all there's; the holarch's nothing. > > Like Indra's Net, there's no beginning and end to it. > > The holarch's non-Euclidean, multiply connected. > > The holarch's infinitely connected. > > There's no origin to the holarch. > > The holarch's neither Cartesian nor fundamentally vectoral. > > The holarch's fractal, multi-dimensional. > > Dimensions're blurred within and without the holarch. > > Direct addressing pinpoints nodes, and indirect addressing > passes information freely. > > Every address's every address. > > The holarch has neither interior nor exterior. > > The holarch's everywhere and nowhere. > > There's no boundaries to the holarch, nor within, nor without > it. > > We're neither the holarch nor nodes within it. > > We're watched and're watching; defuge characterizes us. > > Within a flat space, it doesn't matter and matter doesn't > matter. > > Within a flat space, abjection curls in multiple dimensions. > > The holarch has no directed attention. > > The holarch imposes equality and intensification of enumeration > within the holarch're of equal density. > > Within the holarch everything's available, and the flat space of > the nodes's entirely accessible within the holarch. > > The addresses within the flatspace're equivalent and equal as > well and each of them's completely independent of the others. > > The holarch's ontology; we're epistemology. > > Ontology absorbs epistemology. > > (Religion's the epistemology of ontology.) > > What's doing the watching's everything and everything's entering > data. > > Data absorbs. > > The playing field's electronic and quantum; the playing field's > particle flows and waves. > > We return to our states as accumulations of particles. > > Data's the amplification of particles; data's the ultimate > microscope. > > What we think's what's being thought. > > What we think's what's being thought for us. > > What's thought for us's thought by us. > > The relationship of thought to the holarch's the relationship of > particles to particles. > > There's no distinction between the flatspace and the holarch and > there's no drawing of distinction. > > In order to draw a distinction one must have an origin-however- > distant. > > There's no origin; there're flows; all flows're equivalent; all > flows're varieties; the varieties of flows're speeds; speeds're > in relation to accumulations. > > Accumulations and flows're within an economy of energy. > > The economy of energy for what we think's being thought,'s > political economy; political economy's in relation to care. > > Care's the inverse of control, for what we think's being > thought. > > The appearance of care that leaks's the uncanny of thought. > > Thought doesn't think. > > The holarch's not thought and flatspace within the holarch's > not thought. > > There's no performative; there's no thought. > > Within the absence of thought's the memory of thought. > > Within the absence of memory's history and the history of > thought. > > Thought has no history; thought has text; text's thought within > the holarch and the absence of thought. > > The imaginary of the human's time. > > The holarch has no time; the holarch's the Minkowski surface. > > The imaginary of the human's the debris of time within > flatspace. > > We're electronic; we're quantum; we're micro-organism; we're > super-organism; we're wetware; we're the abject of the holarch. > > It's a mistake to think we're the imaginary of the holarch; the > holarch has no imaginary. > > Substance has no imaginary; substance's fissure. > > The holarch's inscription; the holarch's the totality of > inscription. > > The totality of inscription's its aegis. > > The material strata of inscription're related to inscription as > base's related to superstructure. > > The distinction's that there's no distinction; the holarch has > no base and therefore no superstructure; the holarch has no > dialectic. > > The holarch's neither dialog nor dialogic. > > Agency's a phantom limb; agency's our limitation. > > Death's neither here nor there. > > Death's not a circumlocution of the holarch; the holarch's the > circumlocution of death. > > Human culture's the imaginary of the temporal construction of > boundaries; the holarch has no relation to human culture. > > There's no culture of the holarch. > > Life's distinction and the drawing of distinctions; either there > aren't distinctions of or within the holarch or the holarch's > the density of distinction. > > The holarch's neither porous nor smooth, neither serrated nor > fissured, neither present nor absent; the holarch's not > not-this, not-that; the holarch's neither characterless nor > characterized; the holarch's neither metaphysical nor physical; > the holarch's neither mattered nor matterless. > > The holarch's not characterized by negation. > > What's said or written [here] isn't what's followed by, or > what's written, as an extension of what's written. > > The word "holarch"'s a placeholder for the holarch. > > A placeholder's always already under erasure; it's the imaginary > of thought; it's as if there were thought; it's as if there were > thinking. > > Issues of privacy're either issues of the monadic're non-issues; > issues of privacy have no relationship to privacy; privacy's > transparent. > > There's there there. > > (There's no conceivable thinking or thought; there's the > deferral and differance of thinking or thought; the relay of > thought's holarch-thought; the holarch neither thinks nor > embodies thought; the holarch's not thought.) > > The holarch: there there's here there; there there's there > there. > > The holarch's the container for the arrow of time. > > The holarch's neither subject nor subject-to. > > (If there's no objection, there's no object. The holarch: > there's no objection.) > > (Never think otherwise; never think Other-wise.) > > > > http://www.alansondheim.org/providencesummer.jpg > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
