On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 15:51:30 -0400 (EDT)
Alan Sondheim <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> elements
> 
> http://www.alansondheim.org/gardensb09.jpg four elements
> http://www.alansondheim.org/hup09.jpg three elements

like these both. first looks like it's going to be  long fight.
double-concentrate ambiguity in the second!


james.




> 
> one element relegated to the positioning of the other in the
> raster, as if there were no gaps between them within the
> symbolic. further, that the ikonic is the site of disconnect or
> rather one element a transformation that necessitates a
> transformation of every other. in a coupling, the transformation
> of one element implies only a certain form of contiguity.
> 
>    A white hard horse has one element.
>    And therefore a white hard horse has one element in common.
> 
> one element, all change; a coupling is that which, upon the
> change of one automorphism leaves one element fixed, or leave
> two distinct. two elements of a spectrum smear, gesturally,
> across the rest.
> 
> common elements :of the lost ninety-two elementals: at last,
> replied Nikuko. nothing but fluids! we could have two elements
> and nothing but fluids! we could have two elements and a whole
> lot of information!
> 
> "it" helps through my helplessness, this naming of two elements,
> the common elements :of the lost ninety-two elementals: in
> gestural logic, distributivity is eliminated - two elements, for
> example magnetism and electricity.
> 
> three elements altogether - a genetic determinism! a "matrix" of
> physical enough! now they'll wed the water, work through all
> four elements! just as all maps of five elements, each connected
> to the other, must have guided her with river maps, each
> connected to the tombs with their five elements, stones worn to
> illegibility degree-zero.
> 
> and then what? there were seven flowers, six elements, and the
> most perfect nights anyone has ever imagined.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to