-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 25/07/14 01:29 PM, James Morris wrote: > > This is all a bit over my head right now, though I'm impressed (via > some very vague intuitions about what it might be while skimming > through).
Thank you! I'm trying to use old net.art and conceptual art ideas to help people think about smart contracts, and using smart contracts to shake up old net.art and conceptual art ideas. There's a critique of objecthood and property in each that I think can benefit from exposure to (although almost certainly not agreement with) the other. > It has that official this is real code asthetic about it too. Yes it's evil actual running code. :-) Web development takes at least 3 languages nowadays (usually 5+), which is crazy. I show only the actual contract code to keep things manageable. > I see the TODOs about check message length, brought this to mind > ;-) https://xkcd.com/1354/ Yes when making something that's meant to have the force of law (or philosophy I guess for some of my contracts) it's important to get things right. I'm very wary of the idea that smart contracts remove human fallibility and corruptability from interactions, as the contracts are ultimately written by people and any computer program can have bugs in it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT1EVRAAoJECciMUAZd2dZJVsH/2OCn9HE8mFkhvQgwHhIf1Tb TgdGhYDlP7Vf5P3nV2u3eV/pS14vcAY7M3jK14FSpYDx+aYvJk+9J0Nki7fUerdw VILqpilyC2poQQBqiPBgR8Qj06qVr3UgRTPKgBzkSLzjZz9cuUJs+Ybd1emkgWBm nkV3pPyRXoMNOChx9e4wafSDizcuh831Rby1RRmA+MEpt7gSV3fEAbwpfOF3yGAg wLlc04MHA2O+cwHarxz+3Z8yY85U+r4UGd0BiMZIO4fncgWwbvOewJy9OXodDYCj Cne2rDWEjO7fLp2+phQKolNzzKeulnLKc2sAt5Rce0l+bixFxXkpO+SLNGC7p7A= =pZiJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
