Thanks Michael,

Yes, I am thinking of the videos on the left as documentation of physical art 
installations, but by juxtaposing them with the pieces to the right which I see 
as "internet art," and then by claiming that entire web project (documentation 
juxtaposed with internet art) is itself be a complete work of "art," then the 
docuemtnation itself become something more than just documentation (although 
it's probably not yet, out of the context of that page, art). In other words, 
if you just happened to view the documentation videos at vimeo out of the 
context of the entire project, they themselves wouldn't be "art" at all, 
whereas if you view them in the context of the project page, they are reclaimed 
again as part of a larger work of art.

Have I ever thought of documentation videos themselves (of installations or 
performances) as their own kind of "video art." I have. I think video 
documentation of new media performances and new media installations can be 
their own weird kind of "documentary video" art. This is of course true with 
experimental "documentaries" about dance (cf: particularly Wim Wenders' 
"documentary" on Pina Bausch and this wonderful "faux documentary" by Charles 
Atlas on Michael Clark: http://ubu.com/dance/clark_hail.html . Atlas famously 
invents this genre in collaboration with Merce Cunningham). But "video 
documentation of art" is especially more likely to skew toward "video art" when 
it is documenting works of new media performance and installation *which 
themselves include* video. It's like the video in the documentation medium is 
somehow responding to the video in the performance/installation medium, and 
that connection or dialogue charges the video documentation and makes it more 
art-rich than if you were just videotaping a painting (although video quite 
actively engages with Richter paintings and Seurat paintings, because the 
technique of both those painters intentionally opens outward toward 
photographic optics).

So did I intentionally edit the documentation video of this particular project? 
Yes, but in such a way as to give a kind of on-site experience; not in such a 
way as to foreground the documentation videos as art themselves per se. Could 
one have an art practice where the video documentation of their performances 
and installations was really more of the main art medium and the performances 
and installations themselves were mere props or set decorations for the 
documentary videos? Definitely. Particularly for an artist like me who doesn't 
live in a major art city, I am always already thinking ahead in my work toward 
the final "documentation" instantiation of the pieces on the internet, because 
that's where most people will see the work. So I have done certain kinds of 
in-studio performances where the video documentation of the art performance has 
actually been screened in film festivals as straight "video art" and has been 
considered on its own as art apart from the context of the original performance 
project. (You yourself know this, because you have featured some of my video 
documentation on dvblog as [a kind of] video art.)

++++++

Three examples:
1.
video: 
http://deepyoung.org/current/breathing/documentation.html
from larger project:
http://deepyoung.org/current/breathing/ 

2. video:
http://www.transart.org/advisors/2014/05/30/curt-cloninger/
from larger project:
http://deepyoung.org/current/remixthebook/
from even larger project:
http://lab404.com/video/cup/

AND THIS WEIRD MASSAGING:
3. video:
deepyoung.org/current/static/
from larger literary project:
http://www.electronicvoicephenomena.net/index.php/curt-cloninger-static-trapped-in-mouths/
turned into net art:
http://playdamage.org/104.html
turned into artist book:
http://www.blurb.com/b/5455837-a-playdamage-flipbook

This is why when you look at http://lab404.com/dreams/library.html , some of 
the thumbnail images in the "art" section look like thumbnail images in the 
"video" and "audio" sections. They are all related. Which is why in good 
conscience I can apply for a job in an academic film department (assuming they 
have all read Youngblood's _Expanded Cinema_), even though I'm not really a 
"video artist."

++++++

All of this is very much related to what I am exploring in the nova scotia 
piece. It has to do with Derrida's idea of the frame (parergon). Dissolving the 
frame is not just institutional critique per se, and it's not as easy as you'd 
think. It's about where the "art" starts, where it ends, how it bleeds out into 
"the world," or remains in that space between out and in. So your comment about 
the net art pieces immediately letting you into the work (into the frame of 
these spaces so to speak) is very relevant. The net art pages are intentionally 
not "framed" (except by the ubiquitous browser window, which has grown 
increasingly thin so as to lead right up to the hardware frame of the monitor 
itself. And there in the barn is the frame of an apple monitor.) Also relevant 
is Joel's comment about my hand opening the barn door. My hand is in two of the 
documentary videos (barn and basement) and also in two of the embedded 
installation videos (the shale video in the basement and the rope video in the 
barn). So how does the "presence" of the artist's videotaped hand in a video 
installation, shown handling materials at the source site (the beach itself) 
alter the "nature" of the physical materials of the rope and the shale once 
they have been removed from the beach and transplanted into the installation 
space (barn and basement)? And then how does the "presence" of the same 
artist's hand in the documentation video of these installations alter the 
"nature" of the installations themselves. The same hand runs through the 
external meta-frame and into the embedded micro-frame. Frames within frames 
within frames, each in turn destabilized/destabilizing, reframed/unframed.

At least that's the way I'd like to frame it here in this art critical (though 
no less "online") meta-meta-meta frame.

(a final comment -- this project is dear to my heart and not unrelated: 
http://joshuacitarella.com/artifacts.html .)

Rock and Roll Ain't No Pollution,
Curt



….
Michael S. wrote:
I can see what Annie means about the web versions - there's something 
more contained and controlled about them which makes them more 
digestible ( I don't mean "easier", I mean more of a piece, more 
something that feels like a controlled emanation from an artist. With 
the others? -yes, we are seeing documentation ( it that how you see it Curt? 
-if it is I would have been very interested in how you might have set 
about making videos that were intended as artworks in themselves rather 
than the kind of "analogical" thing going on with the web 
versions)..but..there's something quite enchanting about the sense of 
specific locations conjured in those videos ( particularly the climb to 
the tree house, though they all have it). The doll piece is wonderfully 
*dark*; it might seem less so to you as you have the timeline of 
participants and their feelings and intentions presumably pretty 
rehearsed in your head but to someone coming to it fresh it evokes a 
genuine unease ( and a poetry too). Your son makes a neat stop motion video.( 
BTW I initially read the tag attached to the doll as a religious reference)
I
found the compartmentalised box with the stones and *that noise*, 
somehow very moving and I haven't the faintest idea why except perhaps 
the suspicion that it might bring childhood memories of handling and 
sorting found things back to the surface.

It's
evocative and humane work but it's also knotty and thorny and requires 
some commitment from the viewer..good things in my view.
Thanks for sharing these - I look forward to the book.
best wishes
michael


...

Hi all,

Here is some work I made during a recent artist residency in Nova Scotia:
http://deepyoung.org/current/nova/index.html

Here is an artist book I made:
http://www.blurb.com/b/5455837-a-playdamage-flipbook

And here is a collection of essays coming out next month:
http://linkeditions.tumblr.com/upcoming

Best,
Curt
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to