If your received idea of "Art" is just an "empty wrapper" then surely applicable "aesthetic issues" and the institutions that foster them are equally vapid/dead. I agree that these art-institutional ponzi schemes cause a lot of grief for those who have subscribed too late. Fortunately, contemporary creative energies are now not so narrowly restricted/defined. Perhaps this and similar arts lists are the last place to seek consolidation but rather, merely to expose the graft/complicity and to point to vibrant propensities elsewhere.
/:b On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, hello | florian kuhlmann wrote: > you may do whatever you want. > > but plz keep in mind. art is just a bourgois fantasy (to > make nice guys with freaky ideas dizzy and horny). but > since we live in a post democratic world, where the > bourgois doesnt play any role, the concept of art is just > an empty wrapper. its a shiny, glimpsy jewel, full of > promises which will never be kept to anyone. > > most people - especially the guys&grrlz who want to be > artists so badly - are not willing to accept this. they > still believe in a concept like your 'great unknown > artists under the evil and dump artworldradar' and! are > willing to sell cheeseburger at mc condalds for nothing at > the same time, to keep the bourgois dream alive. and while > these 99% get nothing accept beautifull depressions, very > few are getting all the value of the label called 'art'. > > if this your way, i am fine. but dont bother us with > concepts of aesthetic issues which are just dead in our > times. _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
