There's huge difference, and I think not seeing that is part of the
problem. All violence isn't neo-liberal/colonialist in origin, all warfare
isn't 'fundamentally' the same, and all aims aren't even commensurate; for
that matter, for me, even the idea of 'origin' becomes suspect; you can
trace local histories as far back as you like, things are much more
tangled than they appear on the surface.
- Alan - I should apologize for the initial post - I received an email
from a moderator at nettime who told me it was "bog-standard" behavior
then - which it wasn't, and these discussions tend to become over-loaded.
re below - ISIS is the child of a _lot_ of things and to simplify it with
a family model again obscures the complexity and (for me) the violence.
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, helen varley jamieson wrote:
:D perhaps that, fundamentally, there is little difference between the two;
they just have different methods to achieve their aims ...
On 16/09/14 8:22 AM, Antye Greie-Ripatti wrote:
Isis when Isis is the child
of the mad policies of the West in the
Middle East.
i just made a few notes in an app called swiftkey
i typed ISIS and the spell corrector changed it into USA
does that mean anything ?
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
--
helen varley jamieson
[email protected]
http://www.creative-catalyst.com
http://www.wehaveasituation.net
http://www.upstage.org.nz
==
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/su.txt
==
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
