http://youtu.be/Aj9yvbHBMu4?list=UUfOnhgDdURgPc0CGq5NAWMQ
http://picassogirl.tumblr.comhttp://www.saatchionline.com/donnakuhn
http://donnakuhn.imagekind.com
http://pinterest.com/sarcasthttp://www.facebook.com/donnakuhnart
http://digitalaardvarks.blogspot.com
http://flickrtab.com/site/1098574599http://www.youtube.com/user/digitalaardvarks
From: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2015 1:35 PM
Subject: NetBehaviour Digest, Vol 2296, Issue 2
Send NetBehaviour mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of NetBehaviour digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: NetArtizens -Ruth Catlow (ruth catlow)
2. Re: NetArtizens -Ruth Catlow (michael szpakowski)
3. A Catalogue of Net Behaviours (Randall Packer)
4. Re: A Catalogue of Net Behaviours (Patrick Lichty)
5. Re: A Catalogue of Net Behaviours (Randall Packer)
6. Re: PIXEL_LAB #10 | THE ARTISTIC CONTEXT OF ACCESS SPACE &
SYNC PULSE ORCHESTRA (~rybn)
7. Re: NetArtizens -Ruth Catlow (ruth catlow)
8. Re: A Catalogue of Net Behaviours (ruth catlow)
9. Re: A Catalogue of Net Behaviours (Randall Packer)
10. Re: A Catalogue of Net Behaviours (Alan Sondheim)
11. Re: A Catalogue of Net Behaviours (NIKOS V)
12. now when (Alan Sondheim)
13. Re: A Catalogue of Net Behaviours (michael szpakowski)
14. Re: A Catalogue of Net Behaviours (Rob Myers)
15. A Behavior of Catalogs (BishopZ)
16. Re: A Note of Thanks (ruth catlow)
17. Re: A Note of Thanks (dave miller)
18. Re: A Note of Thanks (Alan Sondheim)
19. Tizer! Sant?, N! - Simon Mclennan (michael szpakowski)
20. Re: A Note of Thanks (Juergen Trautwein)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:21:41 +0000
From: ruth catlow <[email protected]>
To: michael szpakowski <[email protected]>, NetBehaviour for
networked distributed creativity <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] NetArtizens -Ruth Catlow
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"
"/grrr!/"
On 07/03/15 10:41, michael szpakowski wrote:
> here:
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/szpako/16518435447/
>
>
> oil on canvas //12X9" //painted from google search // posted to Flickr
>
> series so far:
> set, so far:
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/szpako/sets/72157651122579216
> cheers
> michael
>
> /resending the ones that failed to show up before ( at least in my
> inbox; sorry if this entails micro-spamming)/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20150307/c71c8cbc/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 12:53:40 +0000 (UTC)
From: michael szpakowski <[email protected]>
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] NetArtizens -Ruth Catlow
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Um -is that a good "grrr" ?
m.
From: ruth catlow <[email protected]>
To: michael szpakowski <[email protected]>; NetBehaviour for networked
distributed creativity <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2015 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] NetArtizens -Ruth Catlow
"grrr!"
On 07/03/15 10:41, michael szpakowski wrote:
here:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/szpako/16518435447/
oil on canvas //12X9" //painted from google search // posted to Flickr
series so far: set, so far:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/szpako/sets/72157651122579216 ? cheers michael
resending the ones that failed to show up before ( at least in my inbox;
sorry if this entails micro-spamming)
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20150307/57a76cf5/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 09:33:43 -0500
From: Randall Packer <[email protected]>
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
<[email protected]>
Subject: [NetBehaviour] A Catalogue of Net Behaviours
Message-ID: <d1207662.3f099%[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
What an extraordinary chorus of voices we have here on the NetBehaviours
List! As a composer, I am interested in how all the parts harmonize together
polyphonically, rub up against each other contrapuntally, provide a sense of
direction and perspective as the lines & melodies of our utterances
collectively play out.
So here is a first pass at some categorical distinctions to provide us with
a ?social taxonomy? of net behaviourism: (I welcome all revisions &
additions!)
Enjoy, Randall
The Alarmists
@BishopZ >>>>> The Internet of Things will inevitably consolidate corporate
power over our personal liberty.
@Alan >>>> The digital, I think, is unbearably fragile; not only is privacy
lost, but we are not prepared, and can't prepare, for the attacks and
corrosion to come.
@Patrick >>>> I see a more profound short-term sense of (pessimism) in the
youth in my regions of interaction.
@Dave >>>> The new breed of technologies might make it more obvious that
government is entirely obsolete.
@Rob >>>>>>> The Cultural Smog Of The Internet? a paralysing weight rather
than an inspiring force.
@Mez >>>>> Whatever the magnitude/form, online dialogues appear to be
flooded with antagonistic commentary.
The Cynics
@Alan >>>>> Do you honestly believe, with all the
hacking/corrosion/cyberwarfare going on, that regulations will make the
slightest bit of difference?
@Edward >>>> But don't hope for too much. They guys with the money hold all
the good cards.
@Isabel >>>>> It's worth being an artist for all sorts of reasons, but not
particularly for social change.
@Simon >>>> jumping on the digital bandwagon seems pointless.
@Karl >>>> there is a word for actor and audience in the social media realm:
prosumer!
@Ruth >>>>> From the perspective of the platform providers, the purpose of
the users actions and interactions is to squirt lucrative data.
@James >>>> the lines (of communication) are already open, we're just
sending information back and forth along them
The Realists
@Ruth >>>> Netartizen #tip3 Social media platforms such as Twitter,
Facebook, Tumblr are not public
@Johannes >>>>>>>>> "(I) find the idea of artizen nation objectionable.
@Paul >>>> We all think we're creating important and relevant work but if
the future doesn't come up with a way to extract and preserve it, then it
probably didn't mean that much to them.
@Marc >>>> What future artists need to know is that they can make their own
contexts beyond the given structures, shoved down their metaphorical gullets
@Edward >>>> I'm not sure I feel like a citizen of the net.
@Isabel >>>> there may be some degree of privilege involved in the
possibility of being/contributing as a Netartizen/Netartisan.
The Apocalyptic
@Kath >>>> if there is some pulse in the future which wipes all the
technology we'll be left with a gap from our digital/online years. let's
hope the libraries survive.
@Patrick >>>>> I feel that social media and the rise of infopower like the
Arab Spring and ISIS, big data, stacks and Baynesian algorithms typify our
time.
@Alan >>>> Who will be physical when the land is scorched? And perhaps more
to the point, what are we, as NetArtizens doing/writing/ about it?
The Hopeful
@David >>>> Perhaps acting out of ignorance (is) an opportunity to create
something that is truly new.
@Rob >>>> Claiming privatised (network) space for the public that is
(supposedly economically) exploited to give it its value, and doing so under
the banner of art, is a political strategy (for those of us who like
political strategies) that has the potential to wrong-foot affective
capital's enclosures.
@Rob >>> Let's make a net we want to be citizens of, for a while.
@Helen >>>> I have long hunted for a good word for this - for audiences
that are participating in a really creative way in a work - & i don't just
mean the "interactivity" of pressing a button or something like that. i mean
co-authoring in a way that they can insert their own creativity &
alter/influence the work.
@Randall >>> The modern day database, content management system, and social
media offer new ways to fully integrate the artistic process into a
dynamically-shared, distributed network.
@Ruth >>>> NetArtizen #tip1: initiate and participate in equal measure.
The Poets
@Bill >>>> would be nice to have MANIC responses
@Ruth >>>> NetArtizen #tip2 There is no one We
@Mez >>>>> N.Et.A[l]rtizen #[s]tip[ewe.lation]3:
S[m]o[dalities+fun]c[t]i[ons_]al[ways]media[ate]platform[at]s.
@Alan >>>>> cultural heritage =
0000000067141066147020145071157060440063556066145063040
@Dark >>>> 404 FILE NOT FOUND I am still alive
The Dreamers
@Gil >>>>> I find out more about the world we live in from netbehaviour than
from anywhere else.
@Randall >>> Let?s conceptualize an approach to networked systems that can
be expressed with any social media platform we may invent or even dream of.
@BishopZ >>>> I had a dream one time of teams of artists paratrooping into
troubled areas - delivering theatrical re-interpretations of local mythology
- explaining in local vernacular the torment that locals faced.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20150307/ddef7d90/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 08:50:16 -0600
From: "Patrick Lichty" <[email protected]>
To: "'NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity'"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A Catalogue of Net Behaviours
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I need to get out of the extremist categories!
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Randall Packer
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2015 8:34 AM
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
Subject: [NetBehaviour] A Catalogue of Net Behaviours
What an extraordinary chorus of voices we have here on the NetBehaviours
List! As a composer, I am interested in how all the parts harmonize together
polyphonically, rub up against each other contrapuntally, provide a sense of
direction and perspective as the lines & melodies of our utterances
collectively play out.
So here is a first pass at some categorical distinctions to provide us with
a "social taxonomy" of net behaviourism: (I welcome all revisions &
additions!)
Enjoy, Randall
The Alarmists
@BishopZ >>>>> The Internet of Things will inevitably consolidate corporate
power over our personal liberty.
@Alan >>>> The digital, I think, is unbearably fragile; not only is privacy
lost, but we are not prepared, and can't prepare, for the attacks and
corrosion to come.
@Patrick >>>> I see a more profound short-term sense of (pessimism) in the
youth in my regions of interaction.
@Dave >>>> The new breed of technologies might make it more obvious that
government is entirely obsolete.
@Rob >>>>>>> The Cultural Smog Of The Internet. a paralysing weight rather
than an inspiring force.
@Mez >>>>> Whatever the magnitude/form, online dialogues appear to be
flooded with antagonistic commentary.
The Cynics
@Alan >>>>> Do you honestly believe, with all the
hacking/corrosion/cyberwarfare going on, that regulations will make the
slightest bit of difference?
@Edward >>>> But don't hope for too much. They guys with the money hold all
the good cards.
@Isabel >>>>> It's worth being an artist for all sorts of reasons, but not
particularly for social change.
@Simon >>>> jumping on the digital bandwagon seems pointless.
@Karl >>>> there is a word for actor and audience in the social media realm:
prosumer!
@Ruth >>>>> From the perspective of the platform providers, the purpose of
the users actions and interactions is to squirt lucrative data.
@James >>>> the lines (of communication) are already open, we're just
sending information back and forth along them
The Realists
@Ruth >>>> Netartizen #tip3 Social media platforms such as Twitter,
Facebook, Tumblr are not public
@Johannes >>>>>>>>> "(I) find the idea of artizen nation objectionable.
@Paul >>>> We all think we're creating important and relevant work but if
the future doesn't come up with a way to extract and preserve it, then it
probably didn't mean that much to them.
@Marc >>>> What future artists need to know is that they can make their own
contexts beyond the given structures, shoved down their metaphorical gullets
@Edward >>>> I'm not sure I feel like a citizen of the net.
@Isabel >>>> there may be some degree of privilege involved in the
possibility of being/contributing as a Netartizen/Netartisan.
The Apocalyptic
@Kath >>>> if there is some pulse in the future which wipes all the
technology we'll be left with a gap from our digital/online years. let's
hope the libraries survive.
@Patrick >>>>> I feel that social media and the rise of infopower like the
Arab Spring and ISIS, big data, stacks and Baynesian algorithms typify our
time.
@Alan >>>> Who will be physical when the land is scorched? And perhaps more
to the point, what are we, as NetArtizens doing/writing/ about it?
The Hopeful
@David >>>> Perhaps acting out of ignorance (is) an opportunity to create
something that is truly new.
@Rob >>>> Claiming privatised (network) space for the public that is
(supposedly economically) exploited to give it its value, and doing so under
the banner of art, is a political strategy (for those of us who like
political strategies) that has the potential to wrong-foot affective
capital's enclosures.
@Rob >>> Let's make a net we want to be citizens of, for a while.
@Helen >>>> I have long hunted for a good word for this - for audiences
that are participating in a really creative way in a work - & i don't just
mean the "interactivity" of pressing a button or something like that. i mean
co-authoring in a way that they can insert their own creativity &
alter/influence the work.
@Randall >>> The modern day database, content management system, and social
media offer new ways to fully integrate the artistic process into a
dynamically-shared, distributed network.
@Ruth >>>> NetArtizen #tip1: initiate and participate in equal measure.
The Poets
@Bill >>>> would be nice to have MANIC responses
@Ruth >>>> NetArtizen #tip2 There is no one We
@Mez >>>>> N.Et.A[l]rtizen #[s]tip[ewe.lation]3:
S[m]o[dalities+fun]c[t]i[ons_]al[ways]media[ate]platform[at]s.
@Alan >>>>> cultural heritage =
0000000067141066147020145071157060440063556066145063040
@Dark >>>> 404 FILE NOT FOUND I am still alive
The Dreamers
@Gil >>>>> I find out more about the world we live in from netbehaviour than
from anywhere else.
@Randall >>> Let's conceptualize an approach to networked systems that can
be expressed with any social media platform we may invent or even dream of.
@BishopZ >>>> I had a dream one time of teams of artists paratrooping into
troubled areas - delivering theatrical re-interpretations of local mythology
- explaining in local vernacular the torment that locals faced.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20150307/7b6e3f00/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:25:13 -0500
From: Randall Packer <[email protected]>
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A Catalogue of Net Behaviours
Message-ID: <d1208245.3f0a2%[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Patrick, you can now count yourself among the hopeful!!
@Patrick >>>>>> I need to get out of the extremist categories!
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Randall Packer
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2015 8:34 AM
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
Subject: [NetBehaviour] A Catalogue of Net Behaviours
What an extraordinary chorus of voices we have here on the NetBehaviours
List! As a composer, I am interested in how all the parts harmonize together
polyphonically, rub up against each other contrapuntally, provide a sense of
direction and perspective as the lines & melodies of our utterances
collectively play out.
So here is a first pass at some categorical distinctions to provide us with
a ?social taxonomy? of net behaviourism: (I welcome all revisions &
additions!)
Enjoy, Randall
The Alarmists
@BishopZ >>>>> The Internet of Things will inevitably consolidate corporate
power over our personal liberty.
@Alan >>>> The digital, I think, is unbearably fragile; not only is privacy
lost, but we are not prepared, and can't prepare, for the attacks and
corrosion to come.
@Patrick >>>> I see a more profound short-term sense of (pessimism) in the
youth in my regions of interaction.
@Dave >>>> The new breed of technologies might make it more obvious that
government is entirely obsolete.
@Rob >>>>>>> The Cultural Smog Of The Internet? a paralysing weight rather
than an inspiring force.
@Mez >>>>> Whatever the magnitude/form, online dialogues appear to be
flooded with antagonistic commentary.
The Cynics
@Alan >>>>> Do you honestly believe, with all the
hacking/corrosion/cyberwarfare going on, that regulations will make the
slightest bit of difference?
@Edward >>>> But don't hope for too much. They guys with the money hold all
the good cards.
@Isabel >>>>> It's worth being an artist for all sorts of reasons, but not
particularly for social change.
@Simon >>>> jumping on the digital bandwagon seems pointless.
@Karl >>>> there is a word for actor and audience in the social media realm:
prosumer!
@Ruth >>>>> From the perspective of the platform providers, the purpose of
the users actions and interactions is to squirt lucrative data.
@James >>>> the lines (of communication) are already open, we're just
sending information back and forth along them
The Realists
@Ruth >>>> Netartizen #tip3 Social media platforms such as Twitter,
Facebook, Tumblr are not public
@Johannes >>>>>>>>> "(I) find the idea of artizen nation objectionable.
@Paul >>>> We all think we're creating important and relevant work but if
the future doesn't come up with a way to extract and preserve it, then it
probably didn't mean that much to them.
@Marc >>>> What future artists need to know is that they can make their own
contexts beyond the given structures, shoved down their metaphorical gullets
@Edward >>>> I'm not sure I feel like a citizen of the net.
@Isabel >>>> there may be some degree of privilege involved in the
possibility of being/contributing as a Netartizen/Netartisan.
The Apocalyptic
@Kath >>>> if there is some pulse in the future which wipes all the
technology we'll be left with a gap from our digital/online years. let's
hope the libraries survive.
@Patrick >>>>> I feel that social media and the rise of infopower like the
Arab Spring and ISIS, big data, stacks and Baynesian algorithms typify our
time.
@Alan >>>> Who will be physical when the land is scorched? And perhaps more
to the point, what are we, as NetArtizens doing/writing/ about it?
The Hopeful
@David >>>> Perhaps acting out of ignorance (is) an opportunity to create
something that is truly new.
@Rob >>>> Claiming privatised (network) space for the public that is
(supposedly economically) exploited to give it its value, and doing so under
the banner of art, is a political strategy (for those of us who like
political strategies) that has the potential to wrong-foot affective
capital's enclosures.
@Rob >>> Let's make a net we want to be citizens of, for a while.
@Helen >>>> I have long hunted for a good word for this - for audiences
that are participating in a really creative way in a work - & i don't just
mean the "interactivity" of pressing a button or something like that. i mean
co-authoring in a way that they can insert their own creativity &
alter/influence the work.
@Randall >>> The modern day database, content management system, and social
media offer new ways to fully integrate the artistic process into a
dynamically-shared, distributed network.
@Ruth >>>> NetArtizen #tip1: initiate and participate in equal measure.
The Poets
@Bill >>>> would be nice to have MANIC responses
@Ruth >>>> NetArtizen #tip2 There is no one We
@Mez >>>>> N.Et.A[l]rtizen #[s]tip[ewe.lation]3:
S[m]o[dalities+fun]c[t]i[ons_]al[ways]media[ate]platform[at]s.
@Alan >>>>> cultural heritage =
0000000067141066147020145071157060440063556066145063040
@Dark >>>> 404 FILE NOT FOUND I am still alive
The Dreamers
@Gil >>>>> I find out more about the world we live in from netbehaviour than
from anywhere else.
@Randall >>> Let?s conceptualize an approach to networked systems that can
be expressed with any social media platform we may invent or even dream of.
@BishopZ >>>> I had a dream one time of teams of artists paratrooping into
troubled areas - delivering theatrical re-interpretations of local mythology
- explaining in local vernacular the torment that locals faced.
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20150307/b5457f99/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 16:46:04 +0100
From: ~rybn <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] PIXEL_LAB #10 | THE ARTISTIC CONTEXT OF
ACCESS SPACE & SYNC PULSE ORCHESTRA
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
stream starts at 17h !
on http://gaite-lyrique.net/rencontre/carte-blanche-a-access-space
On 27/02/2015 17:56, Jake Harries wrote:
> PIXEL_LAB #10 | THE ARTISTIC CONTEXT OF ACCESS SPACE & SYNC PULSE ORCHESTRA
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> in: Laboratoire Ouvert
> @ la Ga?t? lyrique,
> Paris.
>
> . Sat. 7 February, 5PM-7PM: talk/discussion
> . Sun. 8 February, 2PM-6PM: public workshop
>
> Warning: Limited to 12 participants only
> Reservations: [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>
>
> #10 | THE ARTISTIC CONTEXT OF ACCESS SPACE
> ------------------------------------------
>
> The artistic context of Access Space;
> A talk by Jake Harries, Creative Producer
>
> At Access Space, people interested in art, design, computers,recycling,
> music, electronics, photography and more meet like-minded people, share
> and develop skills and work on creative, enterprising and technical
> projects. Access Space runs Refab Space, a DIY FabLab, developed and
> completed in 2012. With its suite of rapid prototyping tools, for
> instance, a laser cutter and 3D printer, this benefits artists, business
> start-ups and the community as a whole.
>
> As well as working with artists, academics, creative technologists,
> programmers, other professionals and students, 50% of the participation
> in Access Space?s activities are from people in danger of exclusion and
> on the margins of society, including: people with disabilities, homeless
> people, ex-offenders, asylum seekers, refugees and people with mental
> health issues. Through Refab Space, Access Space engages with self
> starters and entrepreneurs as well. One of the strengths of Access Space
> is that it brings people from different backgrounds together. We aim to
> inspire people to do new creative things; we aim to make a positive
> impact on people?s lives by helping them to get out of their comfort
> zone in a supportive environment.
>
> We operate at a very low cost with a minimal carbon footprint through
> our innovative model, which combines free, open source software and
> locally sourced recycled computers.
>
> &
>
> Alternative Finance Residencies by artists at Access Space 2014
> A talk by Jake Harries, Creative Producer
>
> Jake will introduce the Access Space artist residency programme, with an
> emphasis on the work of the two most recent resident artists.
>
> Artist & trader Kate Rich's residency, Creative Accounting, on the
> darker macro arts of economics, drew on a wild expanse of research from
> the mainstream to the outlier, to map out some swathes of established
> economic thought on paper for a birds eye view of the habitat. These
> maps had no pretence of depicting reality, but instead laid out truths
> that economists hold to be self-evident. A careful reading of the system
> is essential in order to disrupt or even navigate it.
> Kate Rich has run Feral Trade, a trans-parochial grocery business and
> underground freight network using the art world as a transportation
> resource since 2003, and is banker at the artist-run Cube Cinema in
> Bristol.
> Feral Trade (http://feraltrade.org/)
>
> Artist & yarn bomber Ruthie Ford's residency, The Crocheted Pound,
> explored the subject of value in the arts and crafts as she worked on
> making a series of crocheted 'coins'. Onto each coin was embroidered its
> value: making time x hourly rate + materials- showing the true value of
> making crochet. Over the weeks these coins stacked up to form an
> installation within the space, and the value was contrasted with the
> price of similar items available on the internet.
> Ruthie sought to answer these questions: How do you value crochet,
> knitting and 'home craft' skills? What value would you give the crochet
> skills you have learnt? What skills/ goods could you offer in exchange
> for these skills? Would you be willing to work in exchange for your
> skills? We still need money! How can skill exchange and working for
> money work together?
> http://www.ruthiefordprojects.blogspot.co.uk/
>
> _
>
> Presenter ? Jake Harries
> Jake is Creative Producer at Access Space, and has developed and run the
> arts programme there since 2007. He is an artist, musician, composer,
> performer and has been making music in Sheffield since the 1980s. Much
> of his current practice is based around using spam emails as raw
> material for composition and performing, including Silicone Bake, a spam
> and Livecoding collaboration with Alex McLean. He was a member of
> electronic funk band Chakk which is best known for building Sheffield's
> first large recording studio, FON Studios, in the mid 1980s, and he has
> been one of ?freestyle techno? and chill-out pioneers Heights of Abraham
> since 1991 .
> Interview from 2011 on art, music and FLOSS
>
> www.furtherfield.org/features/interviews/free-and-open-all-interview-jake-harries
> <http://flosswww.furtherfield.org/features/interviews/free-and-open-all-interview-jake-harries>
> @jakeharries
>
>
> SYNC PULSE ORCHESTRA
> ---------------------
>
> Sync Pulse Orchestra
> A workshop facilitated by Access Space, Sheffield, UK
>
> Some times artists are isolated, lonely perhaps, or feel they need to
> work on their own exclusively. At Access Space we believe collaboration
> is an essential part of artistic practice.
>
> The Sync Pulse Orchestra, an electronics and collaborative performance
> workshop, is based around the most basic part of a computer, the CMOS
> chip (http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/C/CMOS.html).
>
> The workshop is 4-5hrs long and for up to 12 participants. There would
> be no soldering involved, so a complete beginner can participate.
>
> Participants will build a 6 voice synthesiser and perform an improvised
> score at the end of the workshop. The synths are synced together so that
> participants collaborate in performance regardless of whether they want
> to or not! And they will learn to create a whole from listening to each
> other.
>
> We will bring specially created CMOS synth kits with heart-shaped Sync
> Pulse Orchestra logos and laser cut heart-shaped badges for participants
> to show they have experienced the joy of performing with others. Sync
> Pulse synths will be free for participants to take away with them.
>
> _
>
> Workshop leader ? John X. Moseley
> John is a tinkerer, musician and engineer, a creator of strange and
> wonderful electronic objects and music making gadgets. He is the
> inventor of ArtBot, an autonomous, free roaming robot which paints
> pictures in an abstract style. John created ArtBot because he wanted to
> submit work to an exhibition by didn't think of himself as a
> painter...so he invented one. ArtBot's first work was exhibited at 20x20
> 2009 in Sheffield. John helped set up and now manages Refab Space,
> Access Space's DIY FabLab. His music can be heard at
> https://soundcloud.com/jo_mo, some photos of his electronics
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/j0_m0/page1/
> Twitter @_Jo_Mo
>
>
>
> ABOUT PIXEL_LAB | LABORATOIRE OUVERT
> ------------------------------------
>
> Within the residency program "Laboratoire Ouvert" of la Ga?t? lyrique,
> Mal au Pixel and the Pixelache network propose a series of monthly
> meetings in Paris, until April 2015, consisting in a public talk and a
> hands-on workshop. Since 2006, Mal au Pixel festival is looking at
> connecting technology, urban electronics and social transformation
> issues, and to investigate our contemporary beliefs. The festival
> brings together young digital artists and unconventional electronics :
> unexpected technologies, open source tools, prototypes and open ended
> events. http://www.malaupixel.org <http://www.malaupixel.org/>
>
> In partnership with Pixelache Network.http://www.network.pixelache.ac
> <http://www.network.pixelache.ac/>
> With the support of the Grundtvig Foundation for Life Long Learning.
>
>
>
> NEXT:
> -----
>
> 24/25/26 April : Conclusion of the pixel_lab cycle: three days of
> meetings, discussions, workshops and performances !
>
>
>
> PRACTICAL INFOS
> ---------------
>
> Talk On Saturday 07/03
> plateau Media 5PM-7PM,
> Free access;
>
> Workshop On Sunday 08/03,
> 2PM-6PM, 5?,
> limited to 12 participants.
>
> Reservations = [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>
>
> --
>
> All the best
> Jake
>
> Please note I work part time at Access Space - usually Tuesdays and
> Thursdays
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> Jake Harries, Creative Producer
> www.access-space.org <http://www.access-space.org> +44(0)114 249 5522
> @accessspace facebook.com/accessspace <http://facebook.com/accessspace>
> 3-7 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 16:33:32 +0000
From: ruth catlow <[email protected]>
To: michael szpakowski <[email protected]>, NetBehaviour for
networked distributed creativity <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] NetArtizens -Ruth Catlow
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"
by which I meant
On 07/03/15 12:21, ruth catlow wrote:
> "/grrr!/"
>
> On 07/03/15 10:41, michael szpakowski wrote:
>> here:
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/szpako/16518435447/
>>
>>
>> oil on canvas //12X9" //painted from google search // posted to Flickr
>>
>> series so far:
>> set, so far:
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/szpako/sets/72157651122579216
>> cheers
>> michael
>>
>> /resending the ones that failed to show up before ( at least in my
>> inbox; sorry if this entails micro-spamming)/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20150307/eb74a7bd/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
????
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
