have a look at autoscopia, it generates 'portraits' from the web (at least
that part of it accessible to search engines)

http://www.autoscopia.net/pages/index.html

more from one of the authors of autoscopia, adam nash:

http://twentyone.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-148-affect-and-the-medium-of-digital-data

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:20 PM, michael szpakowski <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I love them. There's a tendecy to ascribe some kind of sympathetic-magic
> "meaning" to this kind of move, as if the act of erasure or homogenising
> has as a straightforward linguistic complement "the pictures are
> earased/flattened/made homogensous therefore this constitutes an effacement
> of any qualities they might have too"... I think this is an
> over-simplification.
> Firstly my work still exists - for that not to be the case you'd have to
> come round my house and forcibly remove the originals and destroy them and
> even then their digital representations ( those on Flickr and any that
> anyone might have downloaded, since everything on my Flickr stream is
> Creative Commons and freely downloadable) are still out there.
> Secondly I think,and this surpises me somewhat, it ignores what seems to
> me to be a crucial feature of the network which is that it enables a kind
> of performative play ( not something new of course but at a much larger
> scale and much more immediate) between artists/makers -akin to rhyming
> battles, variations on a theme of, skipping games, pas de deux, joke turn
> taking. I take the fact someone *plays* with work I have made as part of
> its "meaning" in the broadest sense of the term. It's something additive,
> not destructive or negating. And it's social and thus profoundly, perhaps
> definingly human. And it's fun.
> cheers
> michael
>
>   ------------------------------
>  *From:* Randall Packer <[email protected]>
> *To:* NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity <
> [email protected]>
> *Cc:* michael szpakowski <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 9, 2015 4:49 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [NetBehaviour] Portraits as Calculated Color Averaging
>
> So @David, first I would like to thank you for this provocative
> translation of Michael’s portraits. The conversion brings up some
> interesting questions concerning our discussion of net behaviours and what
> might be a statement concerning net identity. (At least I can construe it
> that way.)
>
> If in fact Michael has lent warmth, personalization, visualization, and a
> sense of “realness" to some of the unique identities and faces
> participating on this list, in your color averaging calculation, does it
> not erase all of that? What we are left with is a single, pure color that
> has been assigned to a hexagram value as used in coding and stylizing on
> the Web. It reminds me a little of the George Lucas film THX1138, in which
> individuality is reduced to numerical values,  a common motif in many
> science fiction films about the horrors of the future & technology &
> identity annihilation.
>
> My question then is whether or not this was at all the intent of the
> series or if it is legitimate in your mind to interpret your renderings
> this way: as commentary on our evolving net identities, how we are
> perceived online, how the distribution and virtualization of our
> personalities might lose their distinction (and detail) via the network as
> they become homogenized in a sea of values.
>
> Randall
>
> From: That Is Repulsive <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity <
> [email protected]>
> Date: Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 6:31 PM
> To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity <
> [email protected]>, michael szpakowski <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] neat NZ rites : helen varley jamieson / MANY
>
> Series so far
> https://www.behance.net/Netartizens
>
> Portraits based on the calculated average colour derived from original
> artworks by michael szpakowski
> Generated using custom Processing script
> 2448x2448px
> PNG File format
>
> #88837f_helen_varley_jamieson.png
> https://www.behance.net/gallery/24308701/88837f_helen_varley_jamiesonpng
>
> #61707a_karl_heinz_jeron.png
> https://www.behance.net/gallery/24308647/61707a_karl_heinz_jeronpng
>
> #6f616d_helen_pritchard.png
> https://www.behance.net/gallery/24308577/6f616d_helen_pritchardpng
>
> #2d2d2e_rob_myers.png
> https://www.behance.net/gallery/24308497/2d2d2e_rob_myerspng
>
> #8c8e92_kath_o'donnell.png
> https://www.behance.net/gallery/24308453/8c8e92_kath_odonnellpng
>
> #adaaad_simon_mclennan.png
> https://www.behance.net/gallery/24308389/adaaad_simon_mclennanpng
>
> #89868d_isabel_brison.png
> https://www.behance.net/gallery/24308275/89868d_isabel_brisonpng
>
> #7f7b81_mez.png
> https://www.behance.net/gallery/24308159/7f7b81_mezpng
>
> #6c706f_alan_sondheim.png
> https://www.behance.net/gallery/24308089/6c706f_alan_sondheimpng
>
> #747892_patrick_lichty.png
> https://www.behance.net/gallery/24308005/747892_patrick_lichtypng
>
> #9c8189_dr_hairy.png
> https://www.behance.net/gallery/24307781/9c8189_dr_hairypng
>
> #837f84_ruth_catlow.png
> https://www.behance.net/gallery/24307661/837f84_ruth_catlowpng
>
> #7e797e_randall_packer.png
> https://www.behance.net/gallery/24307275/7e797e_randall_packerpng
>
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8 Mar 2015, at 20:42, michael szpakowski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/szpako/16755763411/
>
> oil on canvas //12X9" //painted from google search // posted to Flickr
>
> series so far:
>
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/szpako/sets/72157651122579216
>
> cheers
> michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
>
> _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to