Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0000000000400c71 in get_line (src=0x0, dest=0x6041a0 ' ' <repeats 38
times>,
length=38, src_remaining=0x7fffffffe710, skip_leading=true,
did_break=0x7fffffffe70c)
at strings.cc:73
73 while (*in == ' ' || *in == '\t')
(gdb) inspect in
$1 = 0x0
(gdb) list
68
69 ch = 0;
70 int brk = 0;
71
72 if (skip_leading) {
73 while (*in == ' ' || *in == '\t')
74 ++in;
75 }
76
77 int ip = 0;
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0000000000400c71 in get_line (src=0x0, dest=0x6041a0 ' ' <repeats
38 times>,
length=38, src_remaining=0x7fffffffe710, skip_leading=true,
did_break=0x7fffffffe70c)
at strings.cc:73
#1 0x0000000000401998 in frame::fill (this=0x6037b0,
content=0x603240 "Michael, you perfectly expressed the dilemma of
increasing complexity and\noverabundance in current day digital
communications. As a result, there must\nalways be, in my opinion, a
strategy that meets t"..., content_remaining=0x7fffffffe778)
at frame.cc:99
#2 0x0000000000400b66 in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffe888) at main.cc:32
(gdb) make
echo Compiling frame.cc
Compiling frame.cc
g++ -ggdb -fno-inline -DDEBUG -Wall -Wextra -c frame.cc -o frame.o
frame.cc: In member function ‘int frame::fill(const char*, const char**)’:
frame.cc:81:17: warning: unused variable ‘ptr’ [-Wunused-variable]
const char* ptr = content;
^
frame.cc:89:9: warning: unused variable ‘rh’ [-Wunused-variable]
int rh = y1 - y0;
^
echo Linking asclay
Linking asclay
g++ -ggdb -fno-inline -DDEBUG -Wall -Wextra main.o strings.o frame.o
-ldl -o asclay
echo asclay was compiled with:
asclay was compiled with:
echo g++ -ggdb -fno-inline -DDEBUG -Wall -Wextra
g++ -ggdb -fno-inline -DDEBUG -Wall -Wextra
(gdb) run
The program being debugged has been started already.
Start it from the beginning? (y or n) y
`/home/sirrom/Projects/asclay/asclay' has changed; re-reading symbols.
Starting program: /home/sirrom/Projects/asclay/asclay ~/randall.txt
file path: '/home/sirrom/randall.txt'
file size: '1374'
____________________________________________
__/======================================\__
__]Michael, you perfectly expressed the[__
__]dilemma of increasing complexity and [__
__]overabundance in current day digital[__
__]communications. As a result, there[__
__]must [__
__]always be, in my opinion, a strategy[__
__]that meets the needs of the times. The[__
__]1990s was a special time for lists[__
__]because they were new, and we weren�t [__
__]inundated with email, social media,[__
__]text messaging, etc., as we are today.[__
__]Nowadays, it is a heroic feat to keep[__
__]up with one�s communications and I am [__
__]always surprised how the mailing lists[__
__]continue to survive because who has [__
__]time for all this anymore? In terms of[__
__]our ongoing critique of net [__
__]behaviors, certainly we have to take[__
__]into account the sheer information [__
__]overload we experience each and every[__
__]day as we attempt to feed each other [__
__]every single minute detail of our[__
__]everyday lives, and in the case of the[__
__]lists, our artwork and research as[__
__]well. That is why a list- driven DIWO[__
__]call [__
__]is a heavy proposition when we are[__
__]literally drowning in information. We[__
__]are [__
__]hanging on for dear life to keep up so[__
__]is it no wonder that responses may go [__
__]from sparse to non- existent. I also[__
__]find that people don�t even read their[__
__]email anymore, they scan it and toss[__
__]it and reply as tersely as possible. [__
__] [__
__]So my conclusion here is that perhaps[__
__]we need to propose new and evolving [__
__]DIWO strategies if we really want to[__
__]�do it with others� via email lists in[__
__]the age of overload. [__
__] [__
__]Randall [__
__\======================================/__
____________________________________________
[Inferior 1 (process 747) exited normally]
(gdb)
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
