thanks. yes I printed out your images, cut the white border my printer uses with a paper guillotine (from ex zine making days), cut the images into strips and mixed them up & stuck them back down upsidedown (to tape the first row so it held together). so I couldn't see what the final images were until the end when I turned them over. the colours look well together and I see some have a couple of eyes/features in each. and yes, weaving from textiles work, plus the weaving together of everyone's ideas/conversations during this month I could try something on the computer but I've been working mostly offline these days (against the netizens idea I suppose! going back to "slow" and manual work to use my hands again)
On 16 March 2015 at 04:12, Michael Szpakowski <[email protected]> wrote: > For some reason I'm only getting about 50% , if that, of posts through..so > I first happened upon Kath's pieces on Flickr ( and it took me a minute to > clock what was going on until I looked at the second and third piece) > I really love these. I love the mechanism of it, the reference back to > exquisite corpse but also the mix of the networked, the technological ( I > presume you printed off at some point) and the handmade. Plus they *look* > great to me...it's that summoning of chance to work upon something > figurative, something given, that just does it for me...( and also the > suggestion of the woven - calls to mind Beryl Korot's different though > related linkage between weaving/software/video) > cheers > m. >
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
