Interesting to see "escrow" mentioned there. Isn't that what the Evolution
admins just stole, funds in escrow that they had personal control over. I
know this represents a decentralized approach... just interesting... still
reading.

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 18/03/15 07:45 PM, Pall Thayer wrote:
> > Honestly, I don't get the whole cryptocontract thing.
>
> Like cryptocurrency, smart-contracts / crypto-contracts are a
> simplification. They're not (yet) like an employment contract or house
> insurance, they're more like buying a can of coke from a vending machine:
>
> http://szabo.best.vwh.net/smart_contracts_idea.html
>
> > To me, contracts
> > are too negotiable and flexible to be computer controlled. How does a
> > cryptocontract negotiate a difference in the interpretation of a
> > contract's terms? Granted, it's not something I've researched at all
> > but, to me, this gets into the realm of advanced AI and that's where I
> > go all skeptical.
>
> Currently, smart contracts are just meant to be simple daemons that
> control easily identified resources like an amount of money, doing
> something with it in response to a well-defined set of inputs.
>
> For an example of thinking through some of the negotiations/flexibility
> you mention, see here:
>
> https://dappsforbeginners.wordpress.com/tutorials/two-party-contracts/
>
> and for whether smart contracts are actually contracts in law and what
> this may mean, see here:
>
> https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/events/luncheon/2014/04/difilippi
>
> The idea that removing state interference from monetary transactions
> will make everything cheaper for us (whoever "us" is...) is naive,
> likewise the idea of contracts as unambiguous and uncaring code stripped
> of human fallibility and corruptability as an unalloyed good. But as the
> auction example shows, it's easy to reintroduce human safeguards into
> these systems.
>
> Web search "Decentralized Autonomous Organization" for more fun stuff.
>
> I have an article on socialist (rather than anarcho-capitalist...) DAOs
> coming up for Furtherfield...
>
> - Rob.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>



-- 
*****************************
Pall Thayer
artist
http://pallthayer.dyndns.org
*****************************
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to