possibly somewhat related.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/apr/12/matthew-crawford-distraction-is-a-kind-of-obesity-of-the-mind-the-world-beyond-your-head
linked in seems good for marketers mainly.
great question about the art/life split. i'm for making money
separately, being as artistic as possible while doing so, and making art
as a hobby. but that may change tomorrow, depending on what i smoke.
On 1/5/2015 3:54 PM, dave miller wrote:
I've been updating LinkedIn over the past few days, looking for work.
With LinkedIn I struggle with balancing commercial jobs and my art
career. I seem to be using my art skills to try to get jobs that may
require creativity, but it's an uneasy and unhappy mix. It also feels
dishonest, as if I'm somehow in denial about how important my art is
to me.
Maybe the problem is me - I've done both commercial work and art and
have always found that the two don't go happily or neatly together,
though in theory they should as I am trying to find work in the
creative industries. Though the political art definitely doesn't fit
on a regular CV, so I hide this.
I just don't think LinkedIn serves the needs of artists. Or academic
research/ funding.
But i might be wrong and just not doing things right?
Are artists using LinkedIn? Or are they using something else? Should
there be a LinkedIn for artists? Is there a gap in the market? Artists
and researchers looking for opportunities/ funding?
Trouble with this way of thinking is I don't like the split life -
work and art - and having to keep them separate. Is it unavoidable?
Would be good to know how others present themselves as artists/
workers / researchers
thanks dave
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
