Hi James,

Sounds very interesting indeed - thanks!

Bugs offer a fantastic focus here! A sort of Bug oriented analysis of
production? ;)

In that case, perhaps it could be claimed that maybe a factory machine, or
even a certain mode of operation, can be thought of in terms of an
algorithm?

I wonder also, in terms of the constant repetition, as in Modern Times
(charlie chaplin..). A simple algorithmic instruction - if x object comes,
then turn it. (then, the X becomes Any object indeed, like the boss's nose
- if my memory is sorta correct..)

Also interesting the idea of an Operating system.. A kind of algorithmic
orchestra of silence and gasps?

Cheers!

ahaxxx


On Sun, August 23, 2015 3:14 pm, James Morris wrote:
> Factories and algorithms and Jeff Koons probably evoke all sorts of
> images
>
> I worked in factories for a number of years scraping a living. Some of
> them were bug ridden in the sense they never ran smoothly, the machines
> frequently broke down. Rain coming through the ceiling halted production
> where it landed on machines. And sometimes pigeons, rats, insects (bugs!)
> lived in the factory.
>
> And I've coded alogrithms (non professionally) and worked to eliminate
> bugs in those alogorithms.
>
> I would say a factory is more operating system than algorithm or maybe
> that is too far. Or more like a monolithic application that can do a number
> of tasks (unlike a modular application that can one task well), so it has
> a number of algorithms working together (supposedly!)
>
> James.
>
>
>
> On 23/08/15 12:58, none wrote:
>
>> A quick question?
>>
>>
>> In this interview, JK talks about a factory of people working to
>> produce His stuff. They seem to work by Knowing the Kind of stuff he'd
>> do - and by the very fact they implement that knowledge under JK's
>> supervision and finance, the objects are His.
>>
>> A question:
>> Is it reasonable to claim that JK's factory operates according to a "JK
>> algorithm" which procedurally generates objects that conform to that
>> particular Algorithm's rules?
>>
>> Kind of going towards making an analogical link between a factory and
>> an algorithm - in a generalised sense - hence a bit uneasy whether or
>> not this analogy can hold water beyond a few reflective drops....
>>
>> Cheers and many thanks for any hints, rebukes, etc.. :)
>>
>>
>> aharonon xx
>>
>>
>> On Sat, August 22, 2015 8:02 pm, none wrote:
>>
>>> Hiyas,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Might interest, a somehow curious interview with JK:
>>> http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/talktojazeera/2015/08/jeff-koons-h
>>> igh- art-plain-extravagance-150820152940671.html
>>>
>>> Reminded me a recent chat I have had, with a certain Berlin based
>>> curator, who assured in no uncertain terms: "I Know these people
>>> [rulers of
>>> Gulf states] are despots. They are not
>>> very nice people. They have slaves and they are brutal towards any
>>> opposition. They run lawless states where rules are arbitrary and
>>> many people get hurt. They treat women worst than objects and are a
>>> bunch of some of the worst people I can think of. HOWEVER, they give
>>> money to art! They think of art only in terms of money. With them, if
>>> I want to do a
>>> project, we are talking hundreds of thousands of Euros, sometimes
>>> millions - not crumbs like 5k euros here and there. So.. Should I not
>>> work for them??"
>>>
>>> Mind, the person I spoke before that, told me about Mafia funded
>>> galleries.. In some ways, it was a sort of preparation..
>>>
>>> Should really stay clear from curiously looking openings in places am
>>>  clueless about.. ;)
>>>
>>> Cheers and Have fun!!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ahar0n xx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
>


_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to