So what do you do when the Distinguished Critic writes a newspaper review where he says one of your prints (in a curated gallery group show) that it "shows neither intellectual nor aesthetic spark."?
Probably nothing, except post to NetBehaviour. All publicity is good publicity, right? Nevertheless, I am astounded that the moldy fig style of journalism still persists, where the critic's opinion is the subject matter of the critique. I suppose it's more entertaining than opening the work up to the reader's judgement. -- Paul -- ----- |(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)| --- http://paulhertz.net/
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour