[image: light]

This is a copy of my latest blogpost. I want to share it here too, because
it might be of interest to some of you who are not connected to me
otherwise.
(Next performance will be March 19th 20h in Im_Flieger in Vienna)

Take care
Annie

We started out with three very different meetings (See turbulence.org
<http://turbulence.org/commissions/besides/>) and then decided to continue
to explore one of them further; we restricted ourselves to a theme and made
the project on “meeting online =” also a research on the relation between
objects/things, text and the voice.
We began experiencing and experimenting the performances as *an other
method of thinking together about both object agency and online
collaboration*.

– We stage a collaborative performance project online.
– Meeting online =
– We are meeting online, trying to get more grip on what is actually
happening in online webcam communication.
– This is a research project where we use performance as a tool.
– Using performance as a tool, is a way to create a common responsibility.
– We use an interface which doesn’t permit that either of us two can become
dominant, an interface that has flaws, glitches, bugs, an interface that
cannot be domesticated.
– We are not developing a performance – our performances are part of a
research process.
*My performances are a research tool, not an object ansich, not something
to show off. *(See allergic-to-utopias
<http://www.digicult.it/digimag/issue-058/annie-abrahams-allergic-to-utopias/>
)

*But the audience? Why should they be interested, What is it for them?* *They
can think with us!*
So far :
*besides, the person I am becoming *1/06 2015
There are :
– *the interface *: two webcam images side by side, one managed by Martina,
one by Annie. Both images have exactly the same size and presence there is
no power relation.
* – a text *: a remix, done together, of phrases read and heard, collected
over one month by Annie and Martina individually. We determined before who
would read what part of the text.
– *objects* : things : we will not use personal objects, things with a very
specific personal history and they should not be too beautiful, as
ordinary, casual, daily as possible.
What did we mean by that, why? We didn’t want things to be symbols. We
almost entirely excluded also natural objects as flowers, leafs etc.,
because, they are already alive on their own and so are too symbolically
loaded too.
The objects were placed in front of the webcam at before undetermined
intervals.
– *the hands* : hands who lay down the objects carefully.
– *two voices* : as neutral as possible. Because the interface merges the
sound of both webcams in one stream, there is no way for the audience to
distinguish if a voice comes from the one or from the other webcam. They
can only hear that there are two different voices, *there is a dialogue*.

*What dialogue? Who is talking to who, who is addressed? Who receives? The
objects replace the faces we are used to see in webcam images. We see them
in close up – they become actors – we can believe them to be intimate, to
have a relation. They too have a / are in dialogue. They too are elements
being in the event. (1)*

*This is where the two subjects meet. This is where we meet.*
In *besides, the city is not a tree,* 22/07 2015 we used a different, more
narrative, mix of the same text collection. We decided to abandon the
neutral voice and let the exchange be more natural allowing for affect to
transpire (2). We speeded the rhythm and alternations.
Hands should be just careful installers, shouldn’t manipulate, nor stay too
long in the frame.
For *besides, smaller than a single pixel* 28/11 2015 we made a new text
collection. No natural objects at all were allowed anymore. Would the
perceived agency of the thing change if we would enter and exit them at
specific moments in the text? If we stopped talking while changing the
objects? Would the objects become more present, have more influence if we
allowed for moments without text?
We stayed with speaking the text in an ordinary manner. Would the dialogue
be more fluent if we decided to use the texts fragments randomly? Would
that give more dialogical power to our voices and rhythm? Would that help
us to use text and objects equally in our perform thinking experience?

*We perform experimenting thinking together using words and things and the
affects transferred via our voices. We experiment performing thinking
together using words and things and the affects transferred via our voices.
We think performing experiments together, We experiment thinking
performance together, We experiment performing thought …*
(1) “According to Bakhtin, in order to ‘overcome’ the separation and
opposition between art and life, between art and culture, the elaboration
of a ‘first philosophy’ is required: The philosophy of event-being. Art and
life cannot and must not tend towards identification, as was the case with
the Situationists, for example. But, in order that the enriching, excessive
and productive difference between art and life be able to express itself,
it is necessary to possess a theory which, whilst maintaining the
irreducible differences between these two dimensions, articulates them in
the achievement of the event.” Maurizio Lazzarato in Dialogism and
Polyphony.
geocities.ws/immateriallabour/lazzarato-dialogism-and-polyphony.html
<http://www.geocities.ws/immateriallabour/lazzarato-dialogism-and-polyphony.html>
(2)
“According to Bakhtin, the voice or intonation, not yet captured in the
‘phonetic abstraction’ of language, is always produced ‘on the threshold of
the verbal and the non-verbal, the said and the non-said’ and it is through
it that it addresses itself to the other. This address is affective and
ethico-political rather than linguistic. It ‘appropriates, travels, avails
itself of linguistic and semiotic elements, confirms and drifts away,
critiques and legitimates meanings and established intonations’. ……………It is
only when the voice penetrates and appropriates words and statements that
the latter loose their linguistic potentiality and turn into actualised
expression. It is only at that moment that words and statements are
encumbered with the a *unique *and non reproducible role in verbal
exchange.” Maurizio Lazzarato generation-online.org/p/fp_lazzarato6.htm
<http://www.generation-online.org/p/fp_lazzarato6.htm>

Notes on performance series *besides, <http://bram.org/besides/>* with
Martina Ruhsam, 03 2016, Annie Abrahams
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to