excellent. very nice.
your sense of depth is a marvel.
thank you again.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Alan Sondheim <sondh...@panix.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Universal Attributes {UA}
>
> http://www.alansondheim.org/nord3.jpg
> http://www.alansondheim.org/nord.mp4
> http://www.alansondheim.org/nord1.jpg
> http://www.alansondheim.org/nord2.jpg
>
> ON = our neighborhood universe, by projection, on top of, on the
> bottom of, our universe.
>
> NON = not our universe; therefore either
>
> N = nowhere if no multiverse or
>
> NON = elsewhere, within one or more universe in a populated
> multiverse
>
> ANON = elsewhere, within a designated but unknown universe in a
> populated multiverse, ANON as in "a not our neighborhood
> universe"
>
> V{ANON,ON} = the set of characteristics of all multiverse
> universes including our own, which may be written V{(AN,1)ON}
> which neatly simultaneously emphasizes our home base ("1") as
> well as V, "all" and note that
>
> V and ANON are slippages which may be restrained by relays
> within AN
>
> This is at best a game which depends on the useless
> clarification of language: nothing lost, and nothing gained. It
> is a sloppy game: N = "not" but also "neighborhood" and A =
> "all" but also resonates with the poetics of anonymity which
> excludes ON, but recuperates it, to the extent that our universe
> - "The Local" - itself is perhaps minimally accessible and
> infinitely unaccessible. Rather than continuums (Peirce or
> other) we might refer to _percolations_ of accessibilities and
> inaccessibilities. In the meantime, there is _no way whatsoever_
> to grasp the immensity (ON) and immensities (ANON) at stake,
> except by virtue of a poetics of extrapolation and
> inaccessibility, as if the granularity of percolation were
> fundamentally irreducible. We are swallowed whole by these
> considerations, and the languaging, which may appear to possess
> sense of one or another form, turns out to be nothing more than
> a _cipher_ that is discernible only by name (ANON, etc.), and
> not at all, whatsoever, by content or reference. All of this
> might be rewritten
>
> ^ = {[0-9, A-Z]} =
>
> in some regular expression, the bracketed terms replaceable by
> anything whatsoever, and the equivalence or substitution in the
> third position, emptied of all content.
>
> -------------------
>
> [I contribute nothing to thought.
> [My thinking is the thought of nothing. [An old post-modern ploy
> contributing nothing.
> [A digital ploy of insertion and (in)accessibility.
> [Ignorant depths.
> ]
>
> ------------------
> ~~
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
--
________________________________________________________________
================================================================
=--------------------------------------------------------=-===-=-=-====--
+_+~_=_~--+__+=-^=-+_+_=^-+__+-=+_+~__=__~-_-____-=++=_--^-===-=-==-=-=--
=--------------------------------------------------------=-===-=-=-====--
http://bishopZ.com
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
