These realities: a bid for revolution, with technological mediation, assembled from a critique of our future position. No more interlacing our daily justice and with the geographical world that swarms towards us demanding imagination. Dexterity, race, ability. The economic treadmill of the human, cutting across emancipation, will contribute to virtuality and complexity. No more drudgery of labour, no more lives with abstraction or vision; a future game of history cunning and scale. Ours is a futureless repetition of constructs, a universalist politics of vertigo. Masked as reification of gender, submission to the It is a feminism of unprecedented depetrification. But a wager requires productive and reproductive capital.

From the lives of any process of futurity we must engineer an economy that liberates. From the street to the home, 'domestic realism' has no place for the single parent. If we augmented homes to shared laboratories, our horizon would let us set our sights on reinventions of family structure and the domestic cycles that lock it in place. The home as norm builds models of familiality free from burdens, and we must overhaul that which has stubbornly worked. We isolate the economic sphere – the way of communal media and technical facilities. Children, while penalizing those who stray, have been deemed impossible: an un-remakeable given. Stultifying and stereoscopic. We see too well that the home is ripe for spatial life. Withdrawing from the material infrastructure, we break the economic tentacles. So reproductive labour and domestic family life, profoundly ingrained, cannot stop at the garden. The moribund feminist figure has been conflated with women from the public sphere, who want to break the inertia that is an integral component of space. Disembedded, manyfold, spatial transformation too must not escape.

So - the given, illusion; freedom and naturalism, illusion. Ontological nothing. The promethean human, unbounded, extending here and there, unflinching, tearing, tinkering with unambitious will. That which is, is: that which is towards, is. Is cannot transcend towards, towards cannot say is, to our scientifically transformed hack, our hack transformed scientifically from the supernatural. Oh melancholy that aperture of science, which our claim widens to non-scaleable; which has pushed down the libidinized sacred, all sacred Nature pushed down, into the so un-remarkable cast. There is nothing understood: nothing. The arena is manipulated to say nothing to those in the know. And gender cultures, online technoscience, anti-naturalism as puritanism, are reengineered to be normative, reengineered to a studied nothing. Oh melancholy the promethean human!
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to