John, excellent point. I think this piece brings up very interesting issues of authenticity, openness, disclosure, etc., in the act of the artist engaging the online viewer and performing via the network (or anyone for that matter). Guido, what are your thoughts on this? Or are you busy typing away right now… Perhaps you could use this listserv as an “open” networked feed for your project.
On 9/1/16, 11:49 AM, "John Hopkins" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: On 01/Sep/16 08:57, Randall Packer wrote: > But we can’t read what you are typing… so there is no content… is that the > point? I don’t mean to criticize the project as I am quite interested in the > idea of the open source broadcast of the artist at work, but the key thing is > knowing what the artist is saying, thinking, feeling, not just the artist as > an on/off switch. Important points, Randall, my thots as well ... of course, if that's not what Guido wanted to do ... the old form/content issue in some way, but it brings up Roy Ascott's idea: "networking invites personal disclosure" ... jh -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr. John Hopkins, BSc, MFA, PhD levitating on bentonite twitter: @neoscenes http://tech-no-mad.net/blog/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
