I'd be perfectly happy if just the zvol part was up-to-date and stable. It would help fill the void of a Xen dom0 hosting domU's on zvols that Oracle created.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Matthias Scheler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:18:12AM -0400, David Wetzel wrote: > > how is the state of netbsd's ZFS vs the ZFS in FreeBSD 9.2? > > How is support for SSDs? > > Not usable unfortunately. It needs work on both ZFS and the generic > vnode layer in NetBSD as far as I know. > > Kind regards > > -- > Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/ >
