On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 06:16:33PM +0100, Petar Bogdanovic wrote: > Hi, > > When /etc/daily encounters failed RAIDframe components, it doesn't issue > a separate report but just mentions it in its "normal" output. > > While I'm archiving daily-reports, I don't ever read them because they > usually consist of non-critical information. A failed rf component, > however, is really something I would like to know ASAP but as it is now, > it's drowned in the daily stream and I would need to write some sieve > filters to single out daily-reports that mention anything raidframe. > > But that seems incomplete and probably unnecessary given the appropriate > way /etc/daily deals with /etc/security output: suppress if empty, > separate report if not.
There are more important informations in daily output; e.g. disk space report, fsck reports, mail queues, etc ... I always read daily outputs, they have already pointed out something wrong beyond raidframe for me (and yes, I do get a lot of them, several dozen per day). -- Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference --
