On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:44:20PM -0500, [email protected] wrote: > > I implied nothing of the sort. I asked a question (read my original post): > > >Not to advocate i386 over amd64, but doesn't NetBSD/i386 support PAE and > >thus can access >2GB of RAM? >
Roght. Which is, in itself, rather vague. I was trying to clarify that. > I was hoping that someone would provide helpful information about PAE > support in i386. What I got was cryptic and would have required that I > spend a fair amount of time reading about PAE to actually understand it. Or you could have asked for a better explanation. What I wrote was a genuine attempt by me to provide some further information about the limitations of PAE. > Usually people here are helpful. You were dismissive and rude. That was not intentional. > I apologize > for responding in kind, but this was the first time I was ever unhappy > that I posted to a NetBSD mailing list. > Right, now here is a trick - unless someone is outright abusing you, just assume that they are trying to help and if you find something too cryptic then just ask for clarification. -- Brett Lymn Staple Guns: because duct tape doesn't make that KerCHUNK sound - xkcd.com
