On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:28:01AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Is anyone else using ALTQ? I am wondering if there are alternatives, or > if fixing altq to be more locking/mp-aware is a good plan (as part of > the general effort in the network stack). > > It seems our copy of pf is getting a bit old, and if that's not going to > be maintained, perhaps altq config should use npf instead. > > My group is not likely to have serious cycles to spend on this over the > next year, but might (or might not) later. I'm mostly asking to see if > anyone else cares about this, or if we're the last people on the planet > using these QoS features in NetBSD :-)
I'm still using it, but only marginally. And with altqd, not with pf :) -- Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference --
