On 28/06/14 12:16, Chris Bannister wrote: [---] >> so, obviously it can't have a disklabel. > Excuse me for interrupting ... but why "obviously"?
http://www.feyrer.de/NetBSD/bx/blosxom.cgi/index.front?-tags=wedges Last sentence of http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2006/09/04/0005.html: ``No > 2TB partitions when using the old on-disk formats though.'' I guess "obvious" is in the eye of the beholder, but the limitations of disklabels have been reachable for regular users for a few years now. -- Kind Regards, Jan
