Hi, all
On 2015/11/23 5:48, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Felix Deichmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Am 22.11.2015 um 17:59 schrieb Christos Zoulas:
>>> And the fix could be something like:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Just to be safe I built and installed a release with your fix and it
>> works fine on 486 and modern amd64 Phenom.
>> Thanks for your support! :)
>>
>>> Of course the llvm version needs to be fixed too, since it doesn't check
>>> at all:
>>
>> Yes, it would be nice if
>> - we could have the fixes in our tree
>> - they could be pulled-up to 7 for coming releases to work on (older)
>> 486 again (6.1.5 worked without fix for me)
Does this change fix PR#49741, right?
http://gnats.netbsd.org/49741
(PR#49741 was filed by the person who reported this problem first in
last February as you
mentioned(https://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-i386/2015/02/06/msg003348.html))
That PR said it occured on his netbsd-6 machine, so it should be pulled
up to netbsd-6, too.
>> - they could be committed upstream to gcc and llvm
>
> Great, I've committed to head and will ask for -7 pullups. I will
> submit them to the gcc and llvm people later.
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
> christos
>
--
-----------------------------------------------
SAITOH Masanobu ([email protected]
[email protected])