Le 2016-02-12 10:27, Fredrik Pettai a écrit :
Then you say “implemented", are you referring to “coded an implementation of VXLAN” or “installed something that knows VXLAN and put it in production” ?
The latter. We did not write nor use it right now, just taking a look.
I’ve done the latter, and it works very well. It solved the same problem your $DAYJOB wants to solve for us. Instead of trying to stretch a LAG in-between the different locations (the old solution, we now use a VXLAN tunnel in-between “leaf" switches at the the different locations. We use eBGP in-between “leaf" <> “spine” switches/routers.
Perfect, that's the kind of feedback I was looking for. Thanks! -- Jean-Yves Migeon
