Only a "troll" because I was disappointed. Otherwise this would be known as kern/50629. Enabling IPv6 and ipfilter at the same time apparently leads to null pointer dereference.
For posterity: Discussed in 2013: https://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-amd64/2013/10/20/msg001959.html Discussed in 2014: https://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2014/02/26/msg024323.html Discussed in 2015: https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2015/08/12/msg019265.html Fixed in 2016: https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-bugs/2016/03/14/msg045418.html Similar issue from 2004 should delay NetBSD 2.0 release, according to kernel dev: https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-net/2004/10/10/0000.html https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-net/2004/10/11/0000.html Ahhh, the good old days, when men were men, and stable was... stable? If anyone actually makes it this far down this awful thread, issue should be fixed in 7.1+ On Mon, Aug 1, 2016, at 11:59 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:19:35PM -0400, metalli...@fastmail.fm wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016, at 10:40 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 05:20:11PM -0400, metalli...@fastmail.fm wrote: > > > > > > > > FWIW, I don't think my standards are higher than Darren Reed's: > > > > > > You understand that he's the author of exactly the code you're > > > complaining > > > about, right? > > > > My God man, that's why I quoted it! I know perfectly well who that is. > > You seem to be complaining that an updated IPfilter isn't working to > your satisfaction -- and in a rude, aggressive way at that -- and then > randomly citing its author as an example of why you're right. Really? > > Something's going on, and I'll probably never get it. But I guess it's > OK if I'm stupid dumb; a mailing list troll is just a bum. > > Thor
