Thanks Johnny So does that means each of the interface has an ip eg 192.168.0.1 on wm1 192.168.0.2 on wm2 and so on and then just bridge all the interface. Ill try that . for now only wm1 had an ip the rest did not have an ifconfig.wmx file
Derrick Lobo -----Original Message----- From: Johnny Billquist [mailto:b...@update.uu.se] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 11:53 AM To: Derrick Lobo; Francisco Valladolid H.; netbsd-users@netbsd.org Subject: Re: creating a netbsd router I seriously doubt agr is what you wanted anyway. It's for if you want to have multiple parallell connections between two devices in order to increase capacity. Ie. aggregate link. A bridge is what you want if you have multiple connections locally, but you want them to all be associated with just one device locally, and they should also be able to communicate directly between two ports without your host being involved. Ie, a hub or a switch like function, with just one interface for your local machine, which works the same as any other port on the bridge. It's all like one ethernet segment. But you need to understand how you actually set it up to get it working. You should not be playing with the individual interfaces... Just add them all to the bridge interface, and then you use the bridge interface. Johnny On 2017-07-19 17:44, Derrick Lobo wrote: > Thanks Everyone > > > > Agr does not work because you have to remove all IPs from the > interface, before you add them.. and then theres no way to add an IP > to the agr. Eg > 192.168.0.1 I need this ip so that it becomes the LAN gateway for my > internal PCs. > > > > Im checking briding, for now I could not get it to work will > investigate this further. > > > > Thanks again everyone > > > > Derrick > > > > > > *From:*Francisco Valladolid H. [mailto:fic...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Sunday, July 16, 2017 6:41 AM > *To:* Derrick Lobo; netbsd-users@netbsd.org > *Subject:* Re: creating a netbsd router > > > > Hi folks > > > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 4:06 AM Derrick Lobo <derrick.l...@givex.com > <mailto:derrick.l...@givex.com>> wrote: > > I have a device with 8 network interface,so wondering if I can set > this up as my router/switch > > Ok > > > > I would like to create eth0 as the WAN interface and the remaining > eth1-6 as the LAN interface so that I can connect multiple switches > and devices directly on the 7 remaining ports.. is vlan, bridging > the way to go .. linux uses bonding and im not sure if freebsds lagg > is the same thing.. Anyone can provide information or link on how I > can achieve this. > > > > Yes you can. You can use bridging, setting VLAN and agrégate > interfaces like Linux with the agr(4) > > > > http://man-k.org/man/NetBSD-current/4/agr?r=1&q=Agr > > > > > > So eth0 would have a public Ip while the rest ports would have one > LAN IP whichis basically a 192.168.0.1 ip and Irun DHCP namedb etc > on these interface to support my LAN. > > > > Yes, eth0 can be wan with the public IP and the rest can be LAN, > setting dhcp over any interfaz and setting a DNS cache. > > > > Please review the npf.conf manual for information about the firewall > program > > > > http://man-k.org/man/NetBSD-current/5/npf.conf?r=2&q=Npf.conf > > > > > > Bes regards. > > Thanks > > Derrick Lobo > > -- > > Francisco Valladolid H. > -- http://blog.bsdguy.net - Jesus Christ follower. > -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: b...@softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol