On a NetBSD 7.1 system, after a network upgrade by the administrator (not me), I see frequent messages in /var/log/messages like this:
dhcpcd[nnnn]: ab0: changing default route via fe80::xxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx dhcpcd[nnnn]: ab0: fe80::xxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx: router expired I believe that the administrator set up the network with 2 routers which are both active and advertising routes. I'm seeing the result, which looks like route flap. I have a Linux system available and I don't see the same thing with it. It configures multiple default IPv6 gateways on the same interface and just hums along. Can NetBSD do the same thing? Except for the log spam, the NetBSD system works fine with this router setup and IPv6. I can just ignore the log spam, but is there a better approach? -- Roy Bixler <rcbix...@nyx.net> "The fundamental principle of science, the definition almost, is this: the sole test of the validity of any idea is experiment." -- Richard P. Feynman
