On 09/13/2017 01:54 PM, Andy Ruhl wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:59 AM, D'Arcy Cain <[email protected]> wrote:
ifconfig tun0 create
ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 netmask 0xfffffffc
route add 10.0.0.2/32 10.0.0.1 # should this be necessary?
route add 192.168.215.0/24 10.0.0.2
On the internal machine I do this:
ifconfig tun0 create
ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xfffffffc
route add 10.0.0.1/32 10.0.0.2 # should this be necessary?
route add 192.168.0.0/24 10.0.0.1
/usr/bin/ssh -f -w 0:0 queen.vex.net true
Those static routes shouldn't be necessary, the 2 tun interfaces are
in the same subnet so no routing is needed.
Thanks. I only added them as an experiment.
Sorry, can't help with the rest, I haven't done this in NetBSD.
That's OK. I figured it out. The machine doing the VPN was not the
gateway. I just had to add a route on the gateway back to the VPN
machine for that subnet.
Thanks.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <[email protected]>
http://www.NetBSD.org/ IM:[email protected]
