On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:50:33 +0000 Chavdar Ivanov <ci4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just tested my Dell T1600 tower with Quadro 600 graphics under both > 7.99.59 and 8.99.6 (from the 7th of November). Both work fine with > dri and whatever 3D acceleration nouveau provides (my usual test is > glxgears - to keep the same fps no matter the size of the window). > > I also have similarly working ThinkPad T61p with Quadro 570M, working > fine as far as the graphics is concerned. > > None of these is new enough, though. I am about to test the live > system on my HP Envy with both Intel HD 530 and GeForce 950M, and I > am pretty sure it will not work as before. I will confirm later. > Hi, thanks for the info. I don't have any specific 3D requirements, I just want to use Xorg + Xfce on NetBSD-8, so anything that does basic 2D graphics will do for me. I'll check out those Quadro cards on ebay, but does anyone have a feel for Nvidia vs AMD graphics support on NetBSD? I always thought AMD support was much better, but I could be wrong. Ideally I'd like to get something that will just work, but can't find latest "graphics hardware compatibility" list for NetBSD anywhere. Cheers.