On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 08:54:12AM +0000, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: > I'd be also interested in your setup - on a W10 hosted VBox (latest) on a > fast M.2 disk I get approximately 5 times slower values, on -current amd64, > having disks attached to SATA, SAS and NVMe controllers (almost the same, > the SAS one is a little slower than the rest, but nowhere near your > figures. :
Hmm, nothing special, latest VBox, Win7 host, plain old hard disk as backend store with NTFS on a SATA disk. But the host has *plenty* of memory, maybe I should have used a larger dd to exhaust buffering. Martin
