> From g...@lexort.com Wed May 23 14:33:00 2018 > From: Greg Troxel <g...@lexort.com> > To: Kathe <ka...@sdf.org> > Cc: netbsd-users@netbsd.org > Subject: Re: zfs and dtrace, as specialized add-ons? > OpenPGP: id=098ED60E > X-Hashcash: > 1:20:180523:netbsd-users@netbsd.org::iEs+bdT6FDUmaPP8:0000000000000000000000000000000000000022VL > X-Hashcash: 1:20:180523:ka...@sdf.org::gbQteaxTN53zT7OW:00002U+k > > Kathe <ka...@sdf.org> writes: > > > why can't zfs and dtrace be supported as specialized add-ons? > > so basically, the system delivered as is should not have zfs > > and dtrace bundle-in but rather be configured and compiled-in > > by those users who need them. > > Why the hatred of zfs? > > We don't have a rule that features which are not implemented and working > on every place you could possibly run NetBSD are banned. We merely have > a norm that everything should be done as portably as is reasonably > possible. > > I've had fairly low-resource machines, and not been bothered by > zfs/dtrace. (In fact, I hope someone will update zfs to catch up with > openzfs, so I can use it.) > > If you have an actual problem, please post about that problem, and > perhaps someone can help you. >
please don't get me wrong, i do not hate zfs. :)
