> I realize that I've maybe made a mistake by assigning a category > matching a non-existing (ever? http://www.netbsd.org/ports/history.html) > port to this PR. Would it make sense to offer just existing ports as > port categories in PR submission form?
No, port-arm is a legitimate category. It is meant for all the ARM ports, of which evbarm is just one. > I've also noticed that there is no maintainer listed for the evbarm port > on the "port maintainers" web page > (http://www.netbsd.org/people/port-maintainers.html). This seems > surprising to me as the port is listed among the "Tier I" ports. Does > this port have a maintainer? I cannot comment on who the official portmaster is, but the evbarm port is fairly active. jmcneill@ does quite a bit of work, for example. -- Benny
