On ott 23 8:19, Greg Troxel wrote: > You should be aware that not that many people use altq.
Yes, I was guessing this. > (I used to use > it heavily, even adding new queueing disciplines, but that was a very > long time ago.) The only important thing is if it's still a good tool for traffic shaping. If it is old, there's no problem (as far as it's still good). > So my advice is: > > don't assume that others know the answers > > read the source code > > I don't mean to discourage you from asking - that's 100% fine. It's > just that I expect that if you want to do what you are describing (which > seems entirely reasonable), I think you will end up digging in to the > code yourself. It is a very honest advice/encouragement. To avoid going off-topic, I'll be concise: you are right, in particular for a couple of questions I asked here lately. Sometimes I don't feel fully independent; in this case, there are two layered difficulties: comprehension of network protocols/procedures, and comprehension of source code. Each of them alone is beyond my capabilities. However, I get the suggestion and will try to do my best. Rocky
