RVP a écrit :
> BERTRAND Joel wrote:
>
>> Now jumbo frames are enabled
>> ...
>> With old Realtek and MTU 1500, throughput was about 10 Mbytes/s.
>> With a new Intel adapter and jumbo frames, I obtain the same result
>> ...
>> I suppose there is somewhere a bottleneck, but where ?
>
> 1. Are ethernet cards on either end gigabit adapters?
Yes.
> 2. Are the cards configured as such by their respective OSes?
> (use ifconfig -v ifname)
Yes.
NetBSD side :
legendre:[~] > ifconfig wm0
wm0: flags=0x8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 9000
capabilities=7ff80<TSO4,IP4CSUM_Rx,IP4CSUM_Tx,TCP4CSUM_Rx>
capabilities=7ff80<TCP4CSUM_Tx,UDP4CSUM_Rx,UDP4CSUM_Tx,TCP6CSUM_Rx>
capabilities=7ff80<TCP6CSUM_Tx,UDP6CSUM_Rx,UDP6CSUM_Tx,TSO6>
enabled=0
ec_capabilities=17<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,EEE>
ec_enabled=2<VLAN_HWTAGGING>
address: b4:96:91:92:77:6e
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex)
status: active
inet 192.168.12.1/24 broadcast 192.168.12.255 flags 0x0
inet6 fe80::b696:91ff:fe92:776e%wm0/64 flags 0x0 scopeid 0x1
qNAP side :
[~] # ethtool eth0
...
Speed: 1000Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Port: MII
...
> 3. Is the ethernet cable between the two machines Cat-5E or
> better (with all 8 wires)? (Performance is sometimes not up
> to spec with some cards and mere Cat-5 cables.)
Cat6a...
Regards,
JKB
