On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 at 18:52 -0400, Brad Spencer wrote: [snip] > As a general rule, although I will say not a required-hard-rule, it > would be a good idea to take not fully failed ZFS member offline before > doing a replacement. If the member has failed completely, that is > different, but if there is any chance that it may actually have > function, it is better is offline it first and then replace. > > In this case, although I will admit I am not completely sure, I think > you can still offline the failing drive and the resilvering of the > replacement might proceed as you expect. [snip]
Thanks. What I ended up doing was detach the replacement device, offline the old one, and then re-issue replace. It's resilvering the replacement now. Will see how it goes.
