SOOOO, its not worth messing with?
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 5:21 AM Johnny Billquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2021-09-18 04:13, Todd Gruhn wrote: > > PYTHON_VERSIONS_ACCEPTED=27 > > > > That would be a min-version, right? What of Python v3.9 is already > > installed? > > I just dont like the thought of having 3 versions of Python installed > > if I only need > > one of those versions. OF COURSE, if Python v 2.7 got installed first, there > > is not much that can be done... > > Unfortunately it isn't that simple, since Python 3.9 isn't a superset of > Python 2.7. Python 3 was a rather major change in the language and not > all Python 2 code will work in Python 3. So if you have code marked as > needing Python 2, there is a fair chance that Python 3 won't cut it at all. > > So with Python, it's definitely not a min-version. Python 2 and Python 3 > will exist side by side for a long time, until all Python 2 code is dead. > > Johnny > > -- > Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus > || on a psychedelic trip > email: [email protected] || Reading murder books > pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
