Em qua, 2024-08-14 às 09:22 +0000, janic...@posteo.de escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> I use ZFS on my NetBSD 10 server for a while to store all my family
> member's data and have never met any problem or data loss. I even
> managed to hack SSD caching into it - the NetBSD version doesn't seem to
> support cache files, only (SSD) disks, but with vnd0 (and a bit
> modification to /etc/rc.d/zfs) it is possible:
>
> NAME STATE
> storage ONLINE
> mirror-0 ONLINE
> wd0 ONLINE
> wd1 ONLINE
> cache
> vnd0 ONLINE
>
> The wd disks are 4TB IronWolves - the server's 8Gb of memory is more
> than enough for this volume (without deduplication, of course).
>
> Warm regards:
>
> J.
>
> On 2024. 08. 08. 21:19, Ted Spradley wrote:
> > Should I trust NetBSD's ZFS with my user's data?
> >
> > I understand that our ZFS isn't being kept up as well as FreeBSD's,
> > that's why I have FreeBSD on one box on my home network, but I'd like
> > to keep all *my* hosts on NetBSD (my users run Windows). I have one
> > user (my wife) who has over 5 Terabytes of stuff she's very protective
> > of, but relies on me to protect it.
> >
> > When I set up the file server I specified compatibility=2020. Would our
> > ZFS understand that?
> >
I had bad experiences with zfs cache on SSD/nvme it crashes with time
once it corrupt the dataset so bad that took days to recover using
zpool import -fF -X .... ironwolfs are good but not as reliable as
WDC RED... I had some craches during power surge.. fortunately
there were 2 using mirror
