Sorry, I was reporting the -current state from a machine with a local patch. Actually -current has 15.1 (and it is not working very well).
Martin
- gdb 15.2 or 16.1 Van Ly
- Re: gdb 15.2 or 16.1 Martin Husemann
- Re: gdb 15.2 or 16.1 Vitaly Shevtsov
- Re: gdb 15.2 or 16.1 Martin Husemann
- Re: gdb 15.2 or 16.1 Vitaly Shevtsov
- Re: gdb 15.2 or 16.1 Martin Husemann
- Re: gdb 15.2 or 16.1 Vitaly Shevtsov
- Re: gdb 15.2 or 16.1 Vitaly Shevtsov
- Re: gdb 15.2 or 16.1 Martin Husemann
- Re: gdb 15.2 or 16.1 Brett Lymn
- Re: gdb 15.2 or 16.1 Vitaly Shevtsov
- Re: gdb 15.2 or 16.1 Van Ly
