Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2026 09:26:11 +0200
From: Ramiro Aceves <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
| I am almost sure that I used "fsck.ext2 /dev/sd0e" instead
| "fsck.ext2 /dev/rsd0e".
| is that possible?
It would be slower, but I doubt a factor of 5 - the biggest effect
is more likely using more CPU time for copying data around.
I doubt that our ext2 fsck is particularly optimised however.
kre
ps: on a big enough filesystem, even ffs fsck on the raw device
can run for days...
